That was not my question. What I was wondering was, if you don't consider a person's sexual phenotype to be part of their biological sex, what is?

So you don't think that phenotyp is a part of a persons biological sex? What is it then?

How does a person with CAIS fit into that definition?

Because we give them the label male or female.

You said yourself that you read about DSD, so I don't need to explain that to you, do I?

Yes. You don't listen and you don't learn. You just stand there holding on to your goalposts, repeating the same fallacies over and over again. That's the polarization game.

Biological sex is chromosomes, gonads, gametes, sex organs and secondary sex characteristics. Bimodal. Just use the right word.

I am one hundred per cent sure that this is how I came to be. However, this does not change the fact that biological sex is bimodal.

Read your bio. You wrote a book about how social media polarizes us, and yet you play the polarization game? Can't stop laughing. You are so much dumber than I thought.

Now you slipped in reproduction, which was not there from the start of the thread. A bit dishonest. Do better.

It doesn't get any more true no matter how many times you repeat it. The world doesn't work that way.

How good that you are knowledgeable. Then you know that there are individuals with the genes XY (male) who have large gametes (female). Think about it for a moment.

Binary is when you only have two options, for example 0 and 1. Biological sex is bimodular, i.e. we have a chain of different 0/1 options, which ultimately results in an individual's sex. If sex had been binary, intersex syndrome would have been impossible.

The person is in a hospital. The doctors do the examinations they need to give the person the right treatment.