Totally fair comment, I realise that this is lacking a lot of nuance!

Please repost for visibility! @jappliedecology.bsky.social @billsutherland.bsky.social @josbarlow.bsky.social @ashsimkins.bsky.social @drkevinwood.bsky.social @rupertseidl.bsky.social @jmbecologist.bsky.social @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social @markuseichhorn.bsky.social

Maybe? It's hard for me to say without having any solid evidence (although I'm sure there's papers on this stuff). I think there's definitely room for replication as well as novelty - we also need lots of similar studies to help us generalise about things.

Yeah, I totally get that but I'd also like stats on the submission to first decision, excluding the desk rejects. The submission to first decision for journal I'm ed for is 13 days, but I know that once peer-review starts it's more like 70+ days.

Yeah, I'm an editor at J Applied too I often have to invite 10+ reviewers to get 2 people to agree. It pays to invite lots of people in on go in my experience. Interested in what you mean by redundant. Stuff on the same topic?

Yeah, I'm really hoping for the same. If they hate it after all this it's going to be really annoying!

Thanks Juan Antonio! Much appreciated. ¡Que tengas buen finde!

Congrat man! Good luck with the new position, Coimbra seems like a really cool place.

Yeah, that was my fear. Those are good ones, but I just feel like I might be missing out on something...