Funnily enough, although some do start early, many things are actually more expensive in early Nov here in EU. Since a few years retailers must use the lowest price during the last 30 days when advertising discount %. So now they raise the prices before to show bigger discount % yle.fi/a/74-20193345

None of the platforms who's value is tied to # of users have, my tiktok which I used to watch and like dog training videos has more followers than my mastodon account where I actually write smart things on a topical instance :-)

I can say pretty much for certain the security industry is asleep at the wheel when it comes to Recall btw - I haven’t seen any independent analysis of it at all, despite it fundamentally altering risk. It also introduces lots of attack surface

From some light reversing everything is a Google dork.

I think a version which simulates the other CXO actions in the background and gives them a mix of personalities and incentives would be much more interesting.

Out of curiosity, how much of the scenario and progression is based on some template and how much is it made up by GPT?

Thanks it was fun but I think it shows the limitations of GPT for games. It was too easy. Also the two games I played had different mechanics for some reason and I'm not sure the rolls are really random :-)

I just played the single player, I guess the dynamics are different in multiplayer.

Not really, just doomscroll now and then, the people I follow are over on mastodon. Also Ivory is so nice :-)

Good thing the LLM's are trained on high quality data like... checks notes, Russian disinformation farms

www.newsguardrealitycheck.com/p/a-well-fun...

(Via the risky.biz newsletter)

I think it's one of the better chromium forks. I disabled BAT immediately but the sponsored wallpapers I've kept. Feels like Brave needs to make money somehow and sponsored wallpapers seems reasonable, even if many of the advertisers are for crypto stuff.

Yeah that post was a bit odd, felt a bit forced.

My takeaway was "this is the stuff we caught" (let's not talk about what we didn't stop or actual signals we use) and "hi APT's see you, please stop or next we will publish you Google search history"

Being transparent on these things is hard though

Offensive security (attacking/red team)

Defensive security (protecting/blue team)

Those questions are multiple-choice ones
> $10 per questions, increased to $30 if 2/3 PhD students from different fields fail to answer
> When answering questions they get $10 for trying and $30 if they get it right

Not sure if it leads to good questions or just tricky ones.

The last LLM test I looked into was the GPQA Diamond, which might be better but I think has it's own incentive problems.

arxiv.org/abs/2311.12022
That dataset is was generated by having PhD's on Upwork create and try to answer questions. The paper talks about trying to balance the incentives.

Which, to their defence, seems to be one of the goals but I'm just not sure it measures anything useful.

@marcushellberg.dev you are more into this subject than me, what are your thoughts?

There are also lots of math, engineering and physics problems which I think makes more sense, as again it's something an expert could calculate.

But my issue with these two is that I don't think either is a good measure of a (pure) LLM.

Seems the goal here is just to make models score low.