monken crusher seems to have vanished completely

im not arguign ur point, but i think colloquially "like" is exclusive (ur point) buut "dislike" is inclusive. if someone says 'i hate pizza' and u say 'what about pepperoni' and they say 'that ones good', most peoples response would be 'you dont hate pizza then' , etc.

It’s always right

parallel for what you’re referring to? A television show , whether a drama or a sitcom or limited series, is also similarly reliant on formal loops that ask for an investment of time & familiarity (content/form) to observe changes that do not disrupt the form itself.

work which provides meaning only in and of itself, but also allows a higher specificity of meaning, which in turn allows the rest (the things bound, including other people and a cultural slice) to express more and deeper meanings.
The other is, do you think television or serialized media is a good

I cannot “understand” these things unless I work through this complexity that binds these disparate elements, which dips within the form (specific inputs in specific contexts) and outside (communal understanding, “meta”, etc.) . The game itself is then a specific thing which forces me through busy

I hav a couple questions, the first is: can’t the same be true of, say, content served by complex & potentially addictive loops like “fighting games”, or pinball?
I can approach both those things thinking “I see art, and music, and a community of practiced understanding around this but

Unbelievable W

where you're in the sacks racing ?

content, content, content !