Prostitute is objectively really cool but might not be an energy I can personally match.

Hey Dove Ellis is pretty cool.

Using the definition from my post...I also think there's probably a stage of development past with it doesn't make sense to worry about a "conceptual" explanation. If you know the distance formula maybe the underlying generalization isn't useful to you any longer.

Are all the psets in one place? Looks great.

I don't know any of these guys yet.

Oh ha the meme is "shup up and take my money," mine is like a quiet polite request.

I think I didn't mean "sample space," or maybe I did, idk. But I think what it's sensitive to is the randomization procedure.

What I remember from thinking about which is more likely with 3 points (obtuse or acute) is you have to define the sample space really really really carefully.

Ugh typo I meant bassetball.

It's a very close cousin to my conceptual understanding piece though.

I thought so too. But where are the likes????

I don't have research, I remember having to rely on my own reasoning when I wrote about this in my book.

I think those specific-heavy explanations usually have the seeds of a general principle, but that's the point -- it's implicit, our job is to nudge students to see it more explicitly.

Got ya covered: pershmail.substack.com/p/triangular...

And on the personal front a story of mine got rejected and it made me wonder whether I still have faith in the story, and I think I do, but faith is wavering.