Many researchers in AI communities similarly fear that the research they work hard on a d freely publish will be used by AI giants without credit or consideration for the true goals behind said research. Many feel discouraged to continue to share their research freely

All this aside from the fact that water consumption is not a good indicator on its own for the sh*** environmental impacts of these models

That hamburger chart going around on Chat GPT water consumption is such BS and it’s come back around so much I get 🤢 looking at it. SA quoting the buger chart should be another proof for the heavy PR campaign that has little to do with the truth, and the willingness to double down on the lies

Probably gonna leave behind the people who collect the little people’s taxes.

They probably have devs name them, next model is gonna be “o3-preview-final-2”

Article says it’ll do deep reasoning as well but only if you want it to and you’ll be able to control the amount of reasoning it’ll do.

Thanks for sharing! Curious what you mean by “performance”. performance on benchmarks? Inference speed?

Her last name is FreeLAND not FreeMAN 🤦‍♀️😆 wtf so ironic

For this case it was already acknowledged that the other company had used the dataset/IP. A really big challenge in other cases is to get them to admit or prove that they did use your data in the first place, before it even gets to fair use…

👏👏👏

Not sure if this has been your experience as well but now more than ever I sense a push to make women in tech invisible. Like we’re going backwards. People giving women a voice to then use it for a different agenda. But also, I really wish they’d stop making THIS guy the face of AI. 🤦‍♀️