I find writing to be very helpful for thinking, so I often write well before having enough data.

Now a days the same data would be a 8 figure 10000 word cell paper with phase separating blobs

For clarity this is a real email released by the US House. Search "house_oversight_030719". Interpretations are left to the reader.

oversight.house.gov/release/over...

Congrats Jacob, a truly monumental piece of work!

Twitter is a hell hole of bots talking to bots. I wouldn't buy to much into the hate and misinformation there. It's just become a far-right hyper-reality, sucks when it start oozing into reality tho

Or more likely, acknowledgement of classic reality would cause him to be kicked out of their delusional reality party.

He’s bought into the hyperreality of the mannosphere right, he cannot acknowledge facts of classic reality as that would crumble the pillars holding up their collective delusions

Wonderful work! I am looking forward to reading it in more depth after my holiday.

I think it shouldn’t have been retracted. Like you say, most interpretations in papers will later be shown to so-so or plain wrong. So are we to retract papers for these reasons. Seems absurd. I think it’s good to assume good faith of the authors.

Thanks Benjamin, I also very much enjoyed your epic on yeast metabolic structural evo!

Carl Sagan too fails his own standards, he did huge damage to the public’s understanding of history with his nonsense cosmos episode on Hypatia and the Library of Alexandria.

Midea?

yes!