Mauricio Romero
banner
marome1.bsky.social
Mauricio Romero
@marome1.bsky.social
Colombian in Mexico. Mountaineer, cyclist, climber. Associate Professor of Economics at ITAM. https://mauricio-romero.com/
XD jdj1jajskka
November 7, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Full paper here: doi.org/10.1086/739022
Also, keep an eye out for a follow-up project with Eric Edmonds, Martina Jakob, and Carla Coccia (in partnership with @poverty-action.bsky.social), testing mentoring and information to prevent dropout in Guatemala.
Preventing School Dropout at Scale: Experimental Evidence from Guatemala | Journal of Labor Economics: Vol 0, No ja
doi.org
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
To sum up: a gov’t-led, ultra low-cost program (USD 2–3/student) reduced dropout at the critical 6th→7th grade transition by 1.2pp (~3%). Effects faded after 2 yrs, highlighting both the promise of these types of intervention to prevent dropout & the need for follow-up support.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Indeed, in 2019, the Ministry rolled out the guide nationwide; cohort differences vanished thereafter, consistent with this.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Despite fadeout, ENTRE is very cost-effective: ~0.64 years of schooling gained per USD 100, far above CCTs/scholarships (0.01–0.17). It has a ~27% IRR and a cost–benefit ratio of 7–17. At <$3/student, ENTRE is affordable within the national education budget.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
ENTRE was designed for scale: led by Guatemala’s Ministry of Education using existing staff, costing only USD 2–3 per student. This gov’t ownership reduced the risk of ‘fade out’ often seen when NGO pilots expand.
(See "experiment at scale" by @karthik-econ.bsky.social Paul Niehaus)
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Qualitative data revealed 3 takeaways: (1) ENTRE signaled dropout prevention as a gov’t priority, motivating teachers; (2) the guide gave concrete tools & legitimacy to act; (3) deep barriers (e.g., poverty, social norms, scarce scholarships) remained, limiting long-run impact.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Admin data let us see longer-term: ENTRE boosted 6th→7th grade transition in 2019, but by 2020–22 gains vanished. Many later dropped out, likely due to a lack of follow-up support in secondary (and other structural factors)
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
We use admin data to track student enrollment for several years. What do we find? Dropout decreases by ~1.2 pp from a 34% base (≈−3.3%). Effects similar across arms; lists and nudges add ~0 beyond training+guide.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
These 4,000 schools were randomly split:
• 1,000 got training + guide
• 1,000 got training + guide + risk list
• 1,000 got training + guide + risk list + nudges
• 1,000 were controls.
Schools were spread nationwide, making this one of the largest dropout-prevention RCTs.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
We evaluated ENTRE in 4,000 Guatemalan schools (from 6,080 eligible, ~44% of all 6th graders). Eligibility required enough secondary school supply, excluded the smallest primaries, and only included schools with some predicted at-risk students.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Finally, some principals received 5 monthly nudges (via the ministry’s portal) to keep dropout top of mind.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Some schools also received a list of 6th-graders at highest risk of dropping out, predicted using sex, age, GPA, grade repetition & school history. The model identified 82% of future dropouts (See doi.org/10.1080/0964... for more details on the predictive model)
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
The core of ENTRE is a half-day training + a practical guide for principals & 6th-grade teachers. The guide offered simple, low-cost strategies: motivate students, help with scholarship information, provide remedial support, engage families, and ease enrollment logistics.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
In 2017, Guatemala’s gov’t & World Bank launched ENTRE, a low-cost early warning system to cut dropout in the 6th→7th transition. It trains principals/teachers, flags at-risk students, and uses behavioral nudges to address knowledge gaps, data deficiencies, and prioritization issues
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Guatemala’s dropout crisis is rooted in deep structural problems: >50% live in poverty, 6th globally in malnutrition, and secondary schools are scarce & urban-biased. While fixing these takes time, we test a low-cost, scalable intervention to reduce dropout now.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
For context: Globally, primary enrollment is near universal, but secondary is not; many drop out in the transition. In Guatemala, 1 in 3 students leave school, moving from 6th→7th grade. Because most schools offer only primary or secondary, switching schools raises dropout risk.
October 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
I have such data for mexico... Not sure if you want it for the US or just generally speaking
October 3, 2025 at 7:48 PM
This is part of a larger agenda studying ECE in India.Expect more soon 🙂

+check out @petterberg.bsky.social, he is on the market and is fantastic;he was the driving force behind this paper: sites.google.com/view/petterb...

His JMP focuses on the long-run effects of outsourced schools in Sweden.
Home
Petter Berg
sites.google.com
September 29, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Our themes relate to other great work:

RCTs: See work by Ganimian @karthik-econ.bsky.social and Walters on improving AWCs; by @joshtdean.bsky.social @seema.bsky.social on vouchers for private preschool

Facts: See ASER Centre Early Years and main ASER Reports
September 29, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Our results provide a unified view of public vs private effects from preschool to the end of primary edu (+ links to inequality).

Substantively, it supports the recent focus on improving ECE systems in India.

New: understanding edu *markets* at this stage is important.
September 29, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Villages with better public pre/primary schools also have better private sectors ➡️ unequal access to quality education across villages.

Why?

Maybe public sector quality induces better performance from the private sector (as Tahir, Bau,Das @nkarachiwalla.bsky.social and Khwaja find in Pakistan)?
September 29, 2025 at 2:44 PM