Although by then his extreme personal generosity was a matter of extensive public record, so it wouldn't have made much difference either way.
Although by then his extreme personal generosity was a matter of extensive public record, so it wouldn't have made much difference either way.
And I'm passionate about Stalker in a way that I've never been about Solaris (understatement), so why do you now appear to be arguing in favour of "attempted objectivity"?
And I'm passionate about Stalker in a way that I've never been about Solaris (understatement), so why do you now appear to be arguing in favour of "attempted objectivity"?
And I'd struggle to be particularly passionate about Solaris, a film I admire more than like—and Tarkovsky didn't like it much himself (and neither did Stanisław Lem). Omitting it was one of my easier decisions!
And I'd struggle to be particularly passionate about Solaris, a film I admire more than like—and Tarkovsky didn't like it much himself (and neither did Stanisław Lem). Omitting it was one of my easier decisions!
Soberingly, since this was 31 years ago, that hasn't dated.
Soberingly, since this was 31 years ago, that hasn't dated.
Re-reading it, I'm still pretty happy with it.
Re-reading it, I'm still pretty happy with it.
I deliberately mentioned his best-known film, because the immediate assumption must be that it's a French name, i.e. Zhool Dassan.
I deliberately mentioned his best-known film, because the immediate assumption must be that it's a French name, i.e. Zhool Dassan.
Mind you, that fits Magee's character.
Mind you, that fits Magee's character.