I imagine it will be lower, less diverse turnout, but still reasonably high. Speaking personally, our contingent (US-based, public school district) had to back out due to budgetary uncertainty stemming, in part, from DOGE’s actions.

We have both. AGOL is for items that need to be shared outside the firewall. Enterprise is deployed internally. We’re mostly adding Enterprise users. Most users need Viewer level access and those are unlimited on Enterprise vs $125 per user on AGOL.

Koop is an option. There are a couple plugins for connecting to Postgres. It basically translates your tables into a FeatureService.

koopjs.github.io

If you haven’t, I suggest getting in writing your recommendation against giving this person admin rights and having whoever is responsible confirm they are overriding your recommendation.

From one AGOL admin to another, I just want to reassure you your instincts on this are correct. This is a bad call. Sorry you’re having to deal with this when there are better, safer solutions already baked in to AGOL

Good observations! Looking at the executive summary it doesn’t break down the results into much detail. I think breaking it down by career stage would be interesting. Less convinced that title would reveal much since (imo) there isn’t much uniformity in how different employers apply GIS job titles

Totally get the nostalgia here. That era of web mapping was so fun! Seems it kinda died with CARTO and Mapbox getting VC funding. So glad Mapzen’s quirky, innovative work is still around and usable as open source software. I actually used Tangram recently to get blend modes in a Leaflet map.