Apparently you have failed to notice how saying "we will follow the law" as discriminatory laws are already being passed is a very different message from how Mamdani handled the issue, which was to express unequivocal support and then get back on topic.

Here's a thread from Twitter shared with Sophia's permission in which she finally is able to talk about Graham using the police as HIS personal goon squad and getting Sophia arrested at home by EIGHT armed police officers, somewhat putting the standard Heathrow armed cops in perspective.

Unsurprising that people who made a vow to have zero romantic/sexual relationships ever would struggle to understand the difference between serial monogamy and non-monogamy.

It ain't a "succession." The whole thing is they're in parallel, not in sequence.

Yeah, the AI has definitely made it worse but it dropped below the "the competitors Google outdid in 2002" threshold like 7 years ago because they decided, like seemingly every big American corporation, that "minimum viable product" is an aspirational way to maximize profits.

Let me guess, you retroactively define anyone ICE detains as an illegal regardless of actual citizenship.

Also "well he [the guy I'm calling a Bolshevik) did it first" is a wild defense. Definitely not beating the "actions are good or bad purely based on who does them" allegations.

You don't make it the focus of your campaign in Iowa, you just include it as an element of your "freedom, equality, and prosperity" message.

That way your opponent has to take an anti-freedom, anti-equality, anti-prosperity position if they want to push the issue.

Only because they fought the battle uncontested on a battlefield they chose the shape of.

If you preemptively frame the issue in a way that is in your favor and hold that line it historically does not work out as well for the bigots.

It's wild how easily people forget that denying medical care to a category of people is definitionally an act of genocide.

This is especially good because it centers the aspects of the issue that are both closest to societal consensus *and* that consensus is in the Democrats' favor.

That's exactly why Republicans constantly try to concoct moral panics about non-issues.

This holiday period is when these companies are the most vulnerable to this kind of pressure, and we have a chance to see real results here!

PLEASE KEEP CALLING. CLOG THEIR PHONE LINES.

It's funny how many right-libertarians will have rhetoric that would label Dubya a leftist but then never seem to actually reach the logical conclusions of that rhetoric.

Classic "morality of actions is determined by the ontological nature of the actor" nonsense.

Ah the classic "I can't do bad things because I define anything I do as being good automatically" copout.