Andrey Lovakov
@lovakov.bsky.social
I am a Researcher at German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW), interested in the quantitative science studies
Character overlap between Nalimov's Naukometriya book chapters and Mulchenko’s Ph.D. dissertation chapters
November 14, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Character overlap between Nalimov's Naukometriya book chapters and Mulchenko’s Ph.D. dissertation chapters
It seems that Bluesky is becoming increasingly popular among scholars in our field www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
September 13, 2025 at 9:31 AM
It seems that Bluesky is becoming increasingly popular among scholars in our field www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Science has covered the paper in the In Brief section www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
March 14, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Science has covered the paper in the In Brief section www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
5/ What kind of misconduct did we find?
In WoS/Scopus journals: data falsification, fake peer reviews, authorship manipulation.
In non-indexed journals: plagiarism and self-plagiarism were more common.
The type of misconduct seems to depend on the journal's visibility and standards.
In WoS/Scopus journals: data falsification, fake peer reviews, authorship manipulation.
In non-indexed journals: plagiarism and self-plagiarism were more common.
The type of misconduct seems to depend on the journal's visibility and standards.
March 11, 2025 at 11:29 AM
5/ What kind of misconduct did we find?
In WoS/Scopus journals: data falsification, fake peer reviews, authorship manipulation.
In non-indexed journals: plagiarism and self-plagiarism were more common.
The type of misconduct seems to depend on the journal's visibility and standards.
In WoS/Scopus journals: data falsification, fake peer reviews, authorship manipulation.
In non-indexed journals: plagiarism and self-plagiarism were more common.
The type of misconduct seems to depend on the journal's visibility and standards.
🚨 New paper alert! 🚨
1/ We investigated the link between research evaluation systems and research misconduct, focusing on the Russian University Excellence Initiative (RUEI) as an example. Here’s a short thread
1/ We investigated the link between research evaluation systems and research misconduct, focusing on the Russian University Excellence Initiative (RUEI) as an example. Here’s a short thread
March 11, 2025 at 11:29 AM
🚨 New paper alert! 🚨
1/ We investigated the link between research evaluation systems and research misconduct, focusing on the Russian University Excellence Initiative (RUEI) as an example. Here’s a short thread
1/ We investigated the link between research evaluation systems and research misconduct, focusing on the Russian University Excellence Initiative (RUEI) as an example. Here’s a short thread
A total of $8.349 billion were spent on APCs between 2019 and 2023. In 2023 MDPI ($681.6 mln), Elsevier ($582.8 mln) and Springer Nature ($546.6 mln) generated the most revenue with APCs. Annual spending almost tripled from $910.3 million in 2019 to $2.538 billion in 2023: arxiv.org/abs/2407.16551
November 19, 2024 at 10:22 AM
A total of $8.349 billion were spent on APCs between 2019 and 2023. In 2023 MDPI ($681.6 mln), Elsevier ($582.8 mln) and Springer Nature ($546.6 mln) generated the most revenue with APCs. Annual spending almost tripled from $910.3 million in 2019 to $2.538 billion in 2023: arxiv.org/abs/2407.16551