Lawrence Kohn
@lkohn.bsky.social
Co-Founder/Partner, Leadership Partners, LLC. | Principal, Teacher, Professor | Author | Amazing Family |leadershippartnerstx.com | Rice U.
5/5
At its best, AI isn’t a substitute for critical thinking or relationships. It’s a catalyst that frees up time for what matters most: human connection and deep learning.
At its best, AI isn’t a substitute for critical thinking or relationships. It’s a catalyst that frees up time for what matters most: human connection and deep learning.
September 1, 2025 at 3:42 PM
5/5
At its best, AI isn’t a substitute for critical thinking or relationships. It’s a catalyst that frees up time for what matters most: human connection and deep learning.
At its best, AI isn’t a substitute for critical thinking or relationships. It’s a catalyst that frees up time for what matters most: human connection and deep learning.
4/5
With frameworks like Blooms, teachers, not companies, shape AI use to serve authentic learning. It’s about transparency, boundaries, and keeping pedagogy at the center.
With frameworks like Blooms, teachers, not companies, shape AI use to serve authentic learning. It’s about transparency, boundaries, and keeping pedagogy at the center.
September 1, 2025 at 3:41 PM
4/5
With frameworks like Blooms, teachers, not companies, shape AI use to serve authentic learning. It’s about transparency, boundaries, and keeping pedagogy at the center.
With frameworks like Blooms, teachers, not companies, shape AI use to serve authentic learning. It’s about transparency, boundaries, and keeping pedagogy at the center.
3/5
Karen Hao’s critique of “ventriloquists for chatbots” is sharp, and it highlights why educators need intentional frameworks. Without them, AI gets imposed on classrooms.
Karen Hao’s critique of “ventriloquists for chatbots” is sharp, and it highlights why educators need intentional frameworks. Without them, AI gets imposed on classrooms.
September 1, 2025 at 3:41 PM
3/5
Karen Hao’s critique of “ventriloquists for chatbots” is sharp, and it highlights why educators need intentional frameworks. Without them, AI gets imposed on classrooms.
Karen Hao’s critique of “ventriloquists for chatbots” is sharp, and it highlights why educators need intentional frameworks. Without them, AI gets imposed on classrooms.
2/5
The goal isn’t to undermine teachers, but to amplify them. Think: scaffolding for idea generation, differentiation, or practice prompts, always guided by teacher judgment.
The goal isn’t to undermine teachers, but to amplify them. Think: scaffolding for idea generation, differentiation, or practice prompts, always guided by teacher judgment.
September 1, 2025 at 3:40 PM
2/5
The goal isn’t to undermine teachers, but to amplify them. Think: scaffolding for idea generation, differentiation, or practice prompts, always guided by teacher judgment.
The goal isn’t to undermine teachers, but to amplify them. Think: scaffolding for idea generation, differentiation, or practice prompts, always guided by teacher judgment.
1/5
I hear your concern, and it’s valid. AI can be misused as a shortcut that cheapens both teaching and learning. That’s not what “AI Blooms” is about….
I hear your concern, and it’s valid. AI can be misused as a shortcut that cheapens both teaching and learning. That’s not what “AI Blooms” is about….
September 1, 2025 at 3:40 PM
1/5
I hear your concern, and it’s valid. AI can be misused as a shortcut that cheapens both teaching and learning. That’s not what “AI Blooms” is about….
I hear your concern, and it’s valid. AI can be misused as a shortcut that cheapens both teaching and learning. That’s not what “AI Blooms” is about….
I could not agree more! Thanks for the insight!!
August 14, 2025 at 11:34 PM
I could not agree more! Thanks for the insight!!
