Lauri Järvilehto
@laurijarvilehto.bsky.social
AI | Thinking | Philosophy | Music
This is now a beach with no elephant created with 4o.
March 26, 2025 at 5:07 PM
This is now a beach with no elephant created with 4o.
No, I think you're actually right. I tried to modify the picture using a prompt and it created a completely new one. That's strange, though, as in my other tests today I've managed to actually generate and modify images using the new system.
March 26, 2025 at 5:07 PM
No, I think you're actually right. I tried to modify the picture using a prompt and it created a completely new one. That's strange, though, as in my other tests today I've managed to actually generate and modify images using the new system.
What makes you think it would be Dall-E though?
March 26, 2025 at 5:03 PM
What makes you think it would be Dall-E though?
Well the generation happened transformer-style (rastering layer by layer) rather than diffusion-style (removing visual noise) so I suppose it should be native? Also, at least back in the day, it labelled the pics with Dall-E when that was used, and as you can see in the screencap, there's no label.
March 26, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Well the generation happened transformer-style (rastering layer by layer) rather than diffusion-style (removing visual noise) so I suppose it should be native? Also, at least back in the day, it labelled the pics with Dall-E when that was used, and as you can see in the screencap, there's no label.
What do you mean?
March 26, 2025 at 4:03 PM
What do you mean?
Sorry, I take that back. On second try, ChatGPT did it right too. Perhaps not as photorealistic as Gemini, but no elephant.
March 26, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Sorry, I take that back. On second try, ChatGPT did it right too. Perhaps not as photorealistic as Gemini, but no elephant.
Gemini's latest in AI Studio actually can. ChatGPT nope.
March 26, 2025 at 9:52 AM
Gemini's latest in AI Studio actually can. ChatGPT nope.
Agreed. I actually realized that we do need a filter, but just one that filters out all the fluff intended to overwhelm so people can really see the severity of the situation.
February 7, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Agreed. I actually realized that we do need a filter, but just one that filters out all the fluff intended to overwhelm so people can really see the severity of the situation.
Meanwhile, the Gaza and Canada sleights of hand get thrown in the same bucket with Musk's purge, and I bet it's not very many people who can actually tell the difference. :/
February 7, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Meanwhile, the Gaza and Canada sleights of hand get thrown in the same bucket with Musk's purge, and I bet it's not very many people who can actually tell the difference. :/
What really wearies me down is, this has been Trump's playbook since forever, and the media still don't show any sign of catching on. Or rather, since Trump generates clicks, they're so heavily incentivized against it it's wishful thinking they'd be more picky.
February 7, 2025 at 4:13 PM
What really wearies me down is, this has been Trump's playbook since forever, and the media still don't show any sign of catching on. Or rather, since Trump generates clicks, they're so heavily incentivized against it it's wishful thinking they'd be more picky.
Good point. Having said that, the fact that the media don't differentiate the smoke and mirrors from the substance really plays into the pocket of them.
I really think the media should cut the T+M news to a third or so & sift out the fluff so we'd get a good picture of what's really going on.
I really think the media should cut the T+M news to a third or so & sift out the fluff so we'd get a good picture of what's really going on.
February 7, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Good point. Having said that, the fact that the media don't differentiate the smoke and mirrors from the substance really plays into the pocket of them.
I really think the media should cut the T+M news to a third or so & sift out the fluff so we'd get a good picture of what's really going on.
I really think the media should cut the T+M news to a third or so & sift out the fluff so we'd get a good picture of what's really going on.
Okay, I take that back. Just got o3 to trip on the good old “farmer, dog, sheep and book” trick.
So still not quite there yet I guess. :P
So still not quite there yet I guess. :P
February 1, 2025 at 12:37 PM
Okay, I take that back. Just got o3 to trip on the good old “farmer, dog, sheep and book” trick.
So still not quite there yet I guess. :P
So still not quite there yet I guess. :P
Any other tricks to try to throw at it? OpenAI’s models since o1 haven’t fallen for Jumbo the Swimming Elephant either, and so far everything I’ve thrown at o3 seems to check out.
February 1, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Any other tricks to try to throw at it? OpenAI’s models since o1 haven’t fallen for Jumbo the Swimming Elephant either, and so far everything I’ve thrown at o3 seems to check out.