Kate Redburn
@kredburn.bsky.social
Associate Prof. and Director, Center for Gender & Sexuality Law, Columbia Law School.
Thank you Bench!!
November 14, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Thank you Bench!!
Reposted by Kate Redburn
In the Harvard Law Review, @kredburn.bsky.social has a new piece explaining what happened in Skrmetti, and what it means for trans rights and sex equality more broadly.
Skrmetti Beyond Scrutiny - Harvard Law Review
In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), a state law that prohibits transgender minors from accessing gender-affirming care.
harvardlawreview.org
November 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM
In the Harvard Law Review, @kredburn.bsky.social has a new piece explaining what happened in Skrmetti, and what it means for trans rights and sex equality more broadly.
Throw in a three bedroom or two while you’re at it
November 5, 2025 at 3:11 AM
Throw in a three bedroom or two while you’re at it
So, no, this is not a tit for tat situation. Context and power matter a lot. Rounding everything up to “cancel culture”
or ”consequence culture” only advances one highly motivated perspective.
or ”consequence culture” only advances one highly motivated perspective.
September 19, 2025 at 12:54 PM
So, no, this is not a tit for tat situation. Context and power matter a lot. Rounding everything up to “cancel culture”
or ”consequence culture” only advances one highly motivated perspective.
or ”consequence culture” only advances one highly motivated perspective.
Recall that the closest analogue was allegations that the Biden admin was connected to social media moderation policy. Justice Barrett found no “concrete link.”
September 19, 2025 at 12:52 PM
Recall that the closest analogue was allegations that the Biden admin was connected to social media moderation policy. Justice Barrett found no “concrete link.”
Reposted by Kate Redburn
There are two big legal issues when states try to fill gaps in fed health insurance regulations: (1) the insurance issue is more likely to require new state legislation than the pharmacy issue & (2) states can’t touch two of the biggest types of insurance - “self-insured” employer plans & Medicare
September 5, 2025 at 2:39 PM
There are two big legal issues when states try to fill gaps in fed health insurance regulations: (1) the insurance issue is more likely to require new state legislation than the pharmacy issue & (2) states can’t touch two of the biggest types of insurance - “self-insured” employer plans & Medicare