Kate Jagger
@katwitdown.bsky.social
“But first, let’s kill all the lawyers”
Ask yourself why
Ask yourself why
November 25, 2025 at 12:35 AM
My latest regeneration .. just came in thru the dog door one night after running reconnaissance on my home and knowing my regenerated pup is a complete psycho!
November 24, 2025 at 7:35 PM
My latest regeneration .. just came in thru the dog door one night after running reconnaissance on my home and knowing my regenerated pup is a complete psycho!
As always, behind every magical cow are hard workers
November 17, 2025 at 8:41 PM
As always, behind every magical cow are hard workers
More details here www.latinojustice.org/en/press/jur...
November 11, 2025 at 11:05 PM
More details here www.latinojustice.org/en/press/jur...
November 11, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Derrick Groves made it 5 mos
November 7, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Derrick Groves made it 5 mos
Not to be out done by wannabe foghorn leghorn kennedy, markwayne opts for “is that a ten gallon hat or are you just glad to see me” sheriff from
Blazing saddles.
What an embarassing group of failed theater kids
Blazing saddles.
What an embarassing group of failed theater kids
November 6, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Not to be out done by wannabe foghorn leghorn kennedy, markwayne opts for “is that a ten gallon hat or are you just glad to see me” sheriff from
Blazing saddles.
What an embarassing group of failed theater kids
Blazing saddles.
What an embarassing group of failed theater kids
My recent walk on … I scored in this year’s neighborhood cat distribution lottery
November 2, 2025 at 10:44 PM
My recent walk on … I scored in this year’s neighborhood cat distribution lottery
Oh. Absolutely not the same. It is the opinion’s use of the phrase “objectively reasonable” that MIGHT explain why the commenter, to whom I had replied the doctrines were “similar,”suggested it was like QI. My response acknowledges that similarity. I never posited they’re the same standard.
October 26, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Oh. Absolutely not the same. It is the opinion’s use of the phrase “objectively reasonable” that MIGHT explain why the commenter, to whom I had replied the doctrines were “similar,”suggested it was like QI. My response acknowledges that similarity. I never posited they’re the same standard.
