Daniel Kamhöfer
banner
kamhoefer.bsky.social
Daniel Kamhöfer
@kamhoefer.bsky.social
Professor of Quantitative Methods in Economics, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau. Affiliated with @iza.org, @cesifo.org, formerly @dice-hhu.bsky.social. Education, skills, and prosperity.
Fräulein als mögliche Anrede und eine nicht funktionierende Online-Buchung... ich wittere einen omitted confounder😅

Kommt nach Ibis, Ibis Budget und Ibis Style jetzt Ibis Retro?
May 19, 2025 at 12:07 PM
Ist die HHU so bibelfest? Trinkfest, sicher – aber bibelfest?
May 8, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Man kann dir dein Entsetzen über diesen Vorschlag ansehen, noch bevor das Video läuft😉

Danke für deinen Einsatz!
April 8, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Twitter ist auch wirklich ein links-grüner Haufen😉
March 27, 2025 at 8:06 PM
I'm feeling oddly proud to be part of the sample you're analyzing...
Thanks for your work!
March 17, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Interesting—shocking?—to see that the political divergence between AfD and others in Germany is bigger than the one in the US between Republicans and Democrats. I did not expect this!
March 12, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Tuition fees paid for my student job and my library books, at least according to a sticker in them. Although I guess a fair amount of tuition fees were just crowding out taxpayer money that universities otherwise got from the state (though this is more of a gut feeling than based on evidence...)
February 28, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Ich schwöre auf diese Gummibärchentüten mit den kleinen Tütchen drin … Für die Umwelt nicht ideal, aber man muss nur mit einer Person spielen, die den Gewinn dann teilen kann (erhöht den Anreiz). Und die Drohung, die Tüte ins Sekretariat zu legen, ist auch glaubwürdiger als bei einem Schokoriegel.
February 28, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Well, it's the foundation's funds, not the personal money of the Board members, but all the same.

I don't reproach them for redirecting funds (although I do think it is short-sighted), but I pointed out the discrepancy to explain why IZA invited nominations for fellows less than four weeks ago.
February 25, 2025 at 6:26 PM
I agree, many networks are "need to know"-base, this is not ideal...

But I'd say that this is true for merit-based networks as well!
February 25, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Well, two letters of recommendation are required, and based on these letters and the applicant's CV, a panel then makes a decision.

I'd say it's at least partly merit-based. Put differently: Would achieving a certain number of points in a somewhat arbitrary publication ranking be more merit-based?
February 25, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong about the last point...
February 25, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Very cool idea!

I just found this paper, maybe you know it already: docs.iza.org/dp17521.pdf
docs.iza.org
January 30, 2025 at 7:27 PM