Juan Pablo De Wes
@juanpablodewes.bsky.social
UK | East London | Labour 🌹
Left leaning centrist
Left leaning centrist
Yet, what is the message that the media has pumped out?
December 2, 2025 at 10:56 AM
Yet, what is the message that the media has pumped out?
Also, while edge cases always exist, the majority of people won’t see other benefits reduced because child benefit increasing
December 1, 2025 at 10:19 AM
Also, while edge cases always exist, the majority of people won’t see other benefits reduced because child benefit increasing
Wages and tax receipts higher than expected.
Good news.
The economy performed better than expected.
The end
Good news.
The economy performed better than expected.
The end
November 30, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Wages and tax receipts higher than expected.
Good news.
The economy performed better than expected.
The end
Good news.
The economy performed better than expected.
The end
Labour’s two budgets have delivered progressive tax and benefit changes that benefit the poorest and children the most.
I’m more than comfortable with that.
I’m more than comfortable with that.
November 27, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Labour’s two budgets have delivered progressive tax and benefit changes that benefit the poorest and children the most.
I’m more than comfortable with that.
I’m more than comfortable with that.
Remember a week when lots of people told you UK gilt yields going up meant Rachel Reeves was doing a bad job?
Are those people today telling you that Rachel Reeves is doing a good job?
If not, ignore them!!!
Are those people today telling you that Rachel Reeves is doing a good job?
If not, ignore them!!!
November 26, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Remember a week when lots of people told you UK gilt yields going up meant Rachel Reeves was doing a bad job?
Are those people today telling you that Rachel Reeves is doing a good job?
If not, ignore them!!!
Are those people today telling you that Rachel Reeves is doing a good job?
If not, ignore them!!!
Interested to see the detail of this.
Something lots have, rightly, been calling for
Something lots have, rightly, been calling for
November 18, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Interested to see the detail of this.
Something lots have, rightly, been calling for
Something lots have, rightly, been calling for
20 years applies to people granted ‘Core Protection’
Most people are expected to be moved off ‘Core Protection’
Also being granted asylum and/or indefinite leave to remain is not the same as becoming a citizen.
Most people are expected to be moved off ‘Core Protection’
Also being granted asylum and/or indefinite leave to remain is not the same as becoming a citizen.
November 18, 2025 at 8:42 AM
20 years applies to people granted ‘Core Protection’
Most people are expected to be moved off ‘Core Protection’
Also being granted asylum and/or indefinite leave to remain is not the same as becoming a citizen.
Most people are expected to be moved off ‘Core Protection’
Also being granted asylum and/or indefinite leave to remain is not the same as becoming a citizen.
Again, that’s not how it works
November 18, 2025 at 8:25 AM
Again, that’s not how it works
Also anyone seeking asylum via the 3 official routes would not have to wait 20 years for permanent settlement either
November 18, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Also anyone seeking asylum via the 3 official routes would not have to wait 20 years for permanent settlement either
“only accepting applications for permanent settlement after 20 years”
This simply isn’t true.
The proposal expects most people to move off ‘Core Protection’ where the 20 year period applies.
This simply isn’t true.
The proposal expects most people to move off ‘Core Protection’ where the 20 year period applies.
November 18, 2025 at 7:17 AM
“only accepting applications for permanent settlement after 20 years”
This simply isn’t true.
The proposal expects most people to move off ‘Core Protection’ where the 20 year period applies.
This simply isn’t true.
The proposal expects most people to move off ‘Core Protection’ where the 20 year period applies.
This any clearer?
November 17, 2025 at 11:06 PM
This any clearer?
Don’t 40% of asylum seekers enter the UK on work/student visas?
This is a very different cohort those you describe above
This is a very different cohort those you describe above
November 17, 2025 at 10:21 PM
Don’t 40% of asylum seekers enter the UK on work/student visas?
This is a very different cohort those you describe above
This is a very different cohort those you describe above
That only applies to people granted ‘Core Protection’
Most asylum seekers are expected to move off ‘Core Protection’
Most asylum seekers are expected to move off ‘Core Protection’
November 17, 2025 at 10:07 PM
That only applies to people granted ‘Core Protection’
Most asylum seekers are expected to move off ‘Core Protection’
Most asylum seekers are expected to move off ‘Core Protection’
This is what Shabana Mahmood says in her foreword
November 17, 2025 at 10:06 PM
This is what Shabana Mahmood says in her foreword
Universal credit is removed if someone, or their partner, has savings > £16k
Other benefits are reduced/removed too.
Other benefits are reduced/removed too.
November 17, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Universal credit is removed if someone, or their partner, has savings > £16k
Other benefits are reduced/removed too.
Other benefits are reduced/removed too.
She isn’t giving that impression.
You are
You are
November 17, 2025 at 9:35 PM
She isn’t giving that impression.
You are
You are
Are you sure the overwhelming majority can't support themselves?
Nearly 40% of asylum claimants start on work/student visas
Nearly 40% of asylum claimants start on work/student visas
November 17, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Are you sure the overwhelming majority can't support themselves?
Nearly 40% of asylum claimants start on work/student visas
Nearly 40% of asylum claimants start on work/student visas
These are the details… which don’t sound that unreasonable to me
November 17, 2025 at 8:40 PM
These are the details… which don’t sound that unreasonable to me
That’s not true….
November 17, 2025 at 8:34 PM
That’s not true….
Again… isn’t there a bit more nuance to this
November 17, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Again… isn’t there a bit more nuance to this
Aren’t the proposals more nuanced than this?
November 17, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Aren’t the proposals more nuanced than this?
What exactly is wrong with limiting the definition of family to “immediate family”?
November 17, 2025 at 8:04 PM
What exactly is wrong with limiting the definition of family to “immediate family”?