Jonathan M. King
jonathanmking.bsky.social
Jonathan M. King
@jonathanmking.bsky.social
Asst Prof of Political Science at the University of Georgia (past: WVU) | U.S federal courts, rules, process, separation of powers | Alum of UW-Madison and Michigan State | Lover of Wisconsin sports teams and Chelsea FC

Jonathanmking.com
This, in turn has led to successful nominations moving quicker than recent confirmations but with a key caveat -- nominations are being prioritized by their position in the judicial hierarchy.

That is, circuit court confirmations are being prioritized over district courts.
April 10, 2025 at 2:00 PM
We demonstrate that the 2013 nuclear option -- where the Senate reduced the cloture threshold (or, ending a filibuster) to a simple majority dramatically changed how the confirmations process works.

Now, nominations are almost exclusively proceeding to confirmation via cloture
April 10, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Newly accepted at American Politics Research (w/ the twitterless Ian Ostrander)!

Like judicial confirmations?
Like Senate rules change?
Want to know how the 2013 nuclear option changed judicial nominations?

Then do I have the paper for you!
April 10, 2025 at 2:00 PM
My toddler's book on the Supreme Court inadvertently explaining the current political situation (looking at you Article I)
February 9, 2025 at 3:09 PM