And, of course, there's an app to check out: www.apps.meta-rep.lmu.de/shiny_umbrel...

Some of the more recent work by Richard Riley communicates quite well on that matter in the context of "classic meta-analysis vs. MLM" (doi.org/10.1002/jrsm...).

Plot twist: the heterogeneity was mostly measurement error! Turns out the heroes of the story were just beating up people who had the flu. Will they retract?!
...all this and other delicious moral dilemmas in "Self-Correction vs. Zombie-Infection".

you're so goated!

Great comment for managing expectations.But naivety around interdisciplinary communication is likely related to its failure. We take years to study our own discipline. Why expect productive collabs with another discipline w/o decent prep? A "single head" necessitates at least some translations/prep.

Love this! Especially the fact that you start with a session on logic. In my experience that's quite foundational and is usually ignored in psychology courses in general. Also, I always thought something about "how/why utilize chance in science" would be cool (before getting to a specific test).

Feedback: What is good? What is bad? (and to complete the sandwich: What else is good?)

German Feedback: How bad is what?