Offensive…and redundant.

Why the name change? Especially since it isn’t accompanied by any other change to format or programming.

The new name isn‘t better than the old one; most would probably say it’s worse.

Revealing whatever is in those files apparently would damage Trump more than the damage he is experiencing now by covering them up. It must be pretty bad.

Not that it should matter. This isn’t—or shouldn’t be—a political issue but one about legality and justice. But fundamentally it is about Trump and his helming the greatest scandal in the U.S. history.

He wants connections between Democrats and Epstein exposed but still refuses to release the records. He must think his followers are absolute morons.

In 2024, Trump and MAGAs wanted fervently to release the records, claiming they were the thing that would “bring down the evil Democrat cabal.” Boy, they sure have reversed course!

Yea but what if it was an ANTIFA baby?

Adding Epstein’s comments to many other bits of circumstantial evidence, it’s hard to believe Trump wasn’t fully aware of his buddy’s crimes and for a long time did nothing about it. It’s also wholly credible that he dabbled a bit in those crimes himself.

A steely gaze, faux-outraged voice, and passionate hand gestures don‘t make a lie true.

Pedo-protecting Prez.

He knew.

And this isn’t even the stuff they‘ve been desperately trying to prevent the public from seeing.

Any Republican who votes against it should be branded as complicit in child sex crimes. Likewise for Senate GOP who block a vote on it. If it gets to Trump and he vetoes it, well, we already know.

Any Republican who doesn’t forcefully repudiate Trump at this point is at least tacitly complicit in child sex crimes.

Omniquel.

Journalism is dead.

Astonishingly the lengths they’re going to to cover up something that a year ago they were demanding the release of because it would “destroy the Democrats.”

I dunno. Who’s to say that pardoning hundreds of seditious cop-maiming rioters and using the DOJ to give preferential treatment to a convicted child sex trafficker to buy her silence are bad things? Sounds potentially murky, morals-wise.

Simply put, they wanted to deny millions of Americans needed healthcare but they disn’t want to pay a political cost for it.

Their excuse now isn’t ”coming clean.” They don’t care if bloodsucking health insurance companies keep making money. They’re just trying to whitewash their bad position.