The pilfering, however, is selective. On articles in Wikipedia's "controversial topics" bucket, the differences are far greater.

And that's where Grokipedia disproportionately adds low-quality sources, including Stormfront and InfoWars.

Dude it's like his whole feed is horny ads for a shitty tower defense Android game but with r/k theory

Ms. Rachel 2028

We are concerned that a publishing culture which rewards sensationalism may drive a decline in standards of rigor. In that respect, everyone has a role to play: it is crucial that researchers, reviewers and editors uphold high standards in their handling of these issues.

The study of the genetics underlying human behavior and social outcomes, with its fraught history and heightened potential for misappropriation, requires rigorous science. The failure to fully reckon with confounding fuels misinterpretation of genetics research and impedes scientific progress.

(iii) how confounding is obscured or even leveraged in a broader class of contemporary genetic studies. In particular, we discuss where claims about genetic causality may reach beyond the evidence.