Yes. How many times in a class can you say, "Well, this is how it [typically, ought to, is designed to, should] work?

If you're ready to flip this seat and send Joni Ernst packing – join me:
secure.actblue.com/donate/zw-so...

After sharing a story about going to pride events as a kid: "I'm living proof that introducing your kids to the gay agenda might result in them growing up to be governor."

"Let's not take the soul-sucking path of sacrificing the most persecuted for that which we deem to be most popular. I know that there are transgender children right now looking out at this world and wondering if anyone is going to stand up for them and for their simple right to exist. Well, I am."

The Catholic Church?

And...you have the rest of 2024 to do as you please.

To me, we might be trading some problems of AP for different problems of DC. In neither, however, are we solving the problems that we ought to. So more broadly, I do worry that efforts to counter AP to high-flying constituencies do so at a great disservices to big majorities of student populations.

Though you and original thread aren't tackling Dual Credit (DC) classes at the moment, DC classes happen to pose the greatest, fastest growing existential threat to College Board/AP in Illinois at the moment.

Yup. On the same page with you. And, like @annieabrams.bsky.social, I teach AP classes despite my own deeply held and publicly shared objections to their practices for reasons shared by you and others in the original thread and beyond.