I’m sorry, but if it’s a choice between being fired & committing murder, that shouldn’t be a tough call. If Navalney & Zelenskyy can risk prison, torture, & death in order to fight for democracy in their homelands, Bradley could’ve risked losing his f**king job in order to not become a war criminal.

needed to learn more, etc. He also defended Bradley, saying he has a stellar record (so the f**k what?) & was in an “impossible situation” or something. He even gave credence to Hegseth’s excuse that it wasn’t HIS fault because he left the room & didn’t directly order the “double tap.” [2/2]

What’s even sicker is when mainline Dem politicos are just as afraid to acknowledge unpleasant truths as Bash. Exhibit A: @markwarner.bsky.social. I’m sorry, but his responses to @billkristolbulwark.bsky.social were awful. He kept saying he refused to rush to judgment, [1/2]
bsky.app/profile/jabb...

most (not all) of the decisions would be far BETTER than the ones we’re getting now! So why is the threat that, “If you expand the court, WE’LL expand it further when we take power!” even a concern? So what? END 4/

single American becoming a Supreme Court justice & opinions being decided American Idol-style. For ex., “Today’s decision was decided with 97 million voting to reinstate Roe & 58 million to keep it overruled, w/ the rest abstaining.” And you know what? If we ever got to that preposterous point, 3/

having more justices is usually going to turn out better for liberals because it’s harder to reach consensus on extremist reactionary positions when more & more people are involved. But I go even further. What is the most absurd outcome that this “tit for tat” strategy could lead to? Every 2/

Amen! I really, truly don’t get the “tit for tat” argument. I.e., “If we expand it to 13, they’ll expand it to 21, & then we’ll have to expand it again, & before you know it we’ll have over 100 Supreme Court justices!” My response is, “Great!” @elienyc.bsky.social has made the argument that 1/

I dunno, man. Those three $1,380 car loan repayments that Hunter made to his dad were pretty damn scandalous. (Yes, this is sarcasm.)
www.cnn.com/2023/12/04/p...

What federal public corruption prosecutors?
www.notus.org/courts/doj-p...

Mind-blowing corruption the MSM will write-off as "unusual use of the pardon during a president's first year in office."