What's a Display Name
@hartg12.bsky.social
My only redeeming quality is I'm a dog lover. Wait that doesn't sound right. Dog owner. Now that doesn't sound good either.
Why did you completely avoid the question of why would there be an incentive for the 40 States to remain in the Union? To say that Texas has big cities that vote blue doesn't address that at all.
November 29, 2025 at 6:28 PM
Why did you completely avoid the question of why would there be an incentive for the 40 States to remain in the Union? To say that Texas has big cities that vote blue doesn't address that at all.
Coastal cities, Urban centers, etc. What is the incentive for those 40 States to remain in the Union and governed by the other 10?
November 29, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Coastal cities, Urban centers, etc. What is the incentive for those 40 States to remain in the Union and governed by the other 10?
Thank you for indulging me. As you can imagine we also might be sick of explaining the wisdom of the electoral college. Let's start with this question. If 95% of the country and something around 40 States have decisions made for the entire country that are more relative to
November 29, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Thank you for indulging me. As you can imagine we also might be sick of explaining the wisdom of the electoral college. Let's start with this question. If 95% of the country and something around 40 States have decisions made for the entire country that are more relative to
Sorry, I looked it up on AI and you're right
November 29, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Sorry, I looked it up on AI and you're right
Wasn't some of that thrown out?
November 29, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Wasn't some of that thrown out?
Decide what's good for the whole country?
November 29, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Decide what's good for the whole country?
So we will keep defining and redefining and keep inspecting for the sake of confidence in the elections.
As far as the electoral college, it's an old argument, but have you ever seen a map of blue votes and red votes distributed across the country? Do you think it would be good for urban centers to
As far as the electoral college, it's an old argument, but have you ever seen a map of blue votes and red votes distributed across the country? Do you think it would be good for urban centers to
November 29, 2025 at 1:30 PM
So we will keep defining and redefining and keep inspecting for the sake of confidence in the elections.
As far as the electoral college, it's an old argument, but have you ever seen a map of blue votes and red votes distributed across the country? Do you think it would be good for urban centers to
As far as the electoral college, it's an old argument, but have you ever seen a map of blue votes and red votes distributed across the country? Do you think it would be good for urban centers to
The confidence of one portion or another of the voting public.
But your statements seemed indicate that you don't want to respect the questions of some of the people
But your statements seemed indicate that you don't want to respect the questions of some of the people
November 29, 2025 at 1:27 PM
The confidence of one portion or another of the voting public.
But your statements seemed indicate that you don't want to respect the questions of some of the people
But your statements seemed indicate that you don't want to respect the questions of some of the people
This is where you wanted to go all along. You believe in the integrity of the elections as long as it doesn't get questioned in a way you don't approve.
and the point I have tried to make is that once you decide to cut out questioning from people you don't like, then you've lost
and the point I have tried to make is that once you decide to cut out questioning from people you don't like, then you've lost
November 29, 2025 at 1:27 PM
This is where you wanted to go all along. You believe in the integrity of the elections as long as it doesn't get questioned in a way you don't approve.
and the point I have tried to make is that once you decide to cut out questioning from people you don't like, then you've lost
and the point I have tried to make is that once you decide to cut out questioning from people you don't like, then you've lost
It's still true and by the way, as a good liberal, you can't use the word fagot. Only fascist use words like that just stereotyping pigeonhole people they don't like in order to rule them
November 29, 2025 at 1:24 PM
It's still true and by the way, as a good liberal, you can't use the word fagot. Only fascist use words like that just stereotyping pigeonhole people they don't like in order to rule them
And do you know how I know Grok was right,
THEY'RE STILL THERE ( soon 500 more).
Isn't it weird that it's illegal and yet they'll be 500 more; I wonder if that's because they can still be there
THEY'RE STILL THERE ( soon 500 more).
Isn't it weird that it's illegal and yet they'll be 500 more; I wonder if that's because they can still be there
November 29, 2025 at 1:23 PM
And do you know how I know Grok was right,
THEY'RE STILL THERE ( soon 500 more).
Isn't it weird that it's illegal and yet they'll be 500 more; I wonder if that's because they can still be there
THEY'RE STILL THERE ( soon 500 more).
Isn't it weird that it's illegal and yet they'll be 500 more; I wonder if that's because they can still be there
Any fucking idiot can find the article they like to support their stupid opinion. You did it with an AP article but didn't look at the rest of the information in the other articles. You don't seem to be familiar with AI . It's summarized the information from lots of different sources. Not just yours
November 29, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Any fucking idiot can find the article they like to support their stupid opinion. You did it with an AP article but didn't look at the rest of the information in the other articles. You don't seem to be familiar with AI . It's summarized the information from lots of different sources. Not just yours
What about the other judge that ruled it was legal? Does that judge not count? Do you only adhere to the legality of decisions you like? I'm not trying to get into name calling just because we could; but you like the ruling in DC better than the ruling in West Virginia
November 29, 2025 at 1:21 PM
What about the other judge that ruled it was legal? Does that judge not count? Do you only adhere to the legality of decisions you like? I'm not trying to get into name calling just because we could; but you like the ruling in DC better than the ruling in West Virginia
Did the legal ruling come from a judge? Did you read this before you hit reply 😄
November 29, 2025 at 1:20 PM
Did the legal ruling come from a judge? Did you read this before you hit reply 😄
It seems your medicine ran out
November 29, 2025 at 1:20 PM
It seems your medicine ran out
I remember when you said respectful. Didn't take much for you to lose it. Will hold means they get to continue to do what they're doing until the appeal happens. You know how I know that, (using all caps for emphasis like you 😄)
THEY ARE STILL THERE
THEY ARE STILL THERE
November 29, 2025 at 1:19 PM
I remember when you said respectful. Didn't take much for you to lose it. Will hold means they get to continue to do what they're doing until the appeal happens. You know how I know that, (using all caps for emphasis like you 😄)
THEY ARE STILL THERE
THEY ARE STILL THERE
And suing for it does it mean it's illegal. Finding a liberal judge in DC not difficult
November 29, 2025 at 1:18 PM
And suing for it does it mean it's illegal. Finding a liberal judge in DC not difficult
Please show me one of their stories where they implicate Trump in pedophilia. I'm not saying it doesn't exist but I haven't seen it
November 29, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Please show me one of their stories where they implicate Trump in pedophilia. I'm not saying it doesn't exist but I haven't seen it
Mention an anecdotal piece of evidence just like you did because I seem to be more palatable to you. He doesn't have to prove that he's not a pedophile, someone has to prove that he is. Democrats screaming it because they lost the election doesn't prove it
November 29, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Mention an anecdotal piece of evidence just like you did because I seem to be more palatable to you. He doesn't have to prove that he's not a pedophile, someone has to prove that he is. Democrats screaming it because they lost the election doesn't prove it
Can anybody hear this person bring up race in a conversation that has nothing to do with it? Would anyone else take this comment seriously 😄
November 29, 2025 at 2:43 AM
Can anybody hear this person bring up race in a conversation that has nothing to do with it? Would anyone else take this comment seriously 😄
You just have your hatred of trump driving you to say things like pedophile.
November 29, 2025 at 2:41 AM
You just have your hatred of trump driving you to say things like pedophile.
I think it's weird that people continue to call people one of the worst things you can (since y'all gave up on Hitler); and to do that through a bunch of assumptions while ignoring Virginia Guthrie actually saying Trump didn't do anything. There may be more evidence that shows something but so far
November 29, 2025 at 2:41 AM
I think it's weird that people continue to call people one of the worst things you can (since y'all gave up on Hitler); and to do that through a bunch of assumptions while ignoring Virginia Guthrie actually saying Trump didn't do anything. There may be more evidence that shows something but so far
Place and we should continue to be vigilant to protect the integrity of our elections?
November 29, 2025 at 2:40 AM
Place and we should continue to be vigilant to protect the integrity of our elections?
I said nothing of the sort. I did not think it would be controversial to say that we should monitor the integrity of our elections.
Yes we should be vigilant and have systems in place to check. It doesn't mean some of those systems don't already exist. So can we agree that there are systems in
Yes we should be vigilant and have systems in place to check. It doesn't mean some of those systems don't already exist. So can we agree that there are systems in
November 29, 2025 at 2:40 AM
I said nothing of the sort. I did not think it would be controversial to say that we should monitor the integrity of our elections.
Yes we should be vigilant and have systems in place to check. It doesn't mean some of those systems don't already exist. So can we agree that there are systems in
Yes we should be vigilant and have systems in place to check. It doesn't mean some of those systems don't already exist. So can we agree that there are systems in