5/ And now, for the key finding: I find no evidence that the introduction of interpreting fees affects immigrants’ use of GP services. Additionally, there is no evidence suggesting that these fees disproportionately impact disadvantaged immigrants.

6/ And now, for the key finding: I find no evidence that the introduction of interpreting fees affects immigrants’ use of GP services. Additionally, there is no evidence suggesting that these fees disproportionately impact disadvantaged immigrants.

Here it is!

💡Other insights

Our coding of articles reveals that the administrative burden literature is actually quite divese - both in terms of methods, geography, and the subjects and policy areas under study.

💡Key insight

Our key contribution is to, based on the coding of articles, built a comprehensive theoretical model of how different streams of administrative burden research relate to one another.

👨‍💻What did we do?

We read and coded all published papers on administrative burdens + all working papers we could get our hands on. In total, 119 papers were included in the review - all published since 2012!

🤔Why a literature review about administrative burdens?

Research on burdens has expanded quickly since the inception of the agenda by @donmoyn.bsky.social and @pamherd.bsky.social. We now begin to see different sub-literatures, and we thought it was a good time to take stock of current knowledge.