The Great Gazoo
@greatgazoo.bsky.social
Generic aging white male gamer / sci-fi nerd, but liberal-flavored!
Possibly silly follow up: if her actions violated federal law, who would be able to bring charges against her? Speaking purely theoretically, of course.
November 24, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Possibly silly follow up: if her actions violated federal law, who would be able to bring charges against her? Speaking purely theoretically, of course.
"...the DOJ has got some leaks."
It scans better that way.
It scans better that way.
November 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM
"...the DOJ has got some leaks."
It scans better that way.
It scans better that way.
It always impresses me when someone claims to predict someone else's behavior in a theoretical situation better than that other person.
November 22, 2025 at 3:57 PM
It always impresses me when someone claims to predict someone else's behavior in a theoretical situation better than that other person.
British monarch: Was that necessary?
November 18, 2025 at 8:10 PM
British monarch: Was that necessary?
Narcissus Makeovers: "A Look to Die For"
November 17, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Narcissus Makeovers: "A Look to Die For"
"o/- ...with their beady little eyes... o/-"
November 16, 2025 at 6:40 PM
"o/- ...with their beady little eyes... o/-"
I had actually considered several alternatives.
Nazis: Too many people would approve.
Jehovah's Witnesses: Didn't want to get religious.
Of course, now I've offended the life-challenged (as they prefer to be called) and, I suppose, the mimes as well, although I don't hear anyone complaining.
Nazis: Too many people would approve.
Jehovah's Witnesses: Didn't want to get religious.
Of course, now I've offended the life-challenged (as they prefer to be called) and, I suppose, the mimes as well, although I don't hear anyone complaining.
November 13, 2025 at 10:13 PM
I had actually considered several alternatives.
Nazis: Too many people would approve.
Jehovah's Witnesses: Didn't want to get religious.
Of course, now I've offended the life-challenged (as they prefer to be called) and, I suppose, the mimes as well, although I don't hear anyone complaining.
Nazis: Too many people would approve.
Jehovah's Witnesses: Didn't want to get religious.
Of course, now I've offended the life-challenged (as they prefer to be called) and, I suppose, the mimes as well, although I don't hear anyone complaining.
It occurs to me that one of a scammer's go to moves is to reinforce the mark's vague suspicion that they're being scammed, but then blame a third party.
November 13, 2025 at 7:04 PM
It occurs to me that one of a scammer's go to moves is to reinforce the mark's vague suspicion that they're being scammed, but then blame a third party.
0% is unrealistic. You can get 5% for zombie mimes with Tourettes (which really ramps up the difficulty, mime-wise).
November 13, 2025 at 6:38 PM
0% is unrealistic. You can get 5% for zombie mimes with Tourettes (which really ramps up the difficulty, mime-wise).
I believe that's only for "official acts"; this predates his time in office.
November 12, 2025 at 3:52 PM
I believe that's only for "official acts"; this predates his time in office.
Spock, of course, was on TOS, so they didn't have the LCARS system at the time.
November 12, 2025 at 9:42 AM
Spock, of course, was on TOS, so they didn't have the LCARS system at the time.
That's kind of the job.
November 10, 2025 at 12:43 PM
That's kind of the job.
"It's not like I wake up every morning and pour Jack Daniels in my Cheerios..."
November 7, 2025 at 3:00 PM
"It's not like I wake up every morning and pour Jack Daniels in my Cheerios..."
Creation stories aren't about creating the physical world, they're about the creation of epistemology. The first thing these gods do is separate the map from the territory (thought vs reality) to determine who gets to name America.
September 28, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Creation stories aren't about creating the physical world, they're about the creation of epistemology. The first thing these gods do is separate the map from the territory (thought vs reality) to determine who gets to name America.
Hey, he was no angel.
September 10, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Hey, he was no angel.
Epstein had that much in wire transfers, but none documented from the idiot (so far)
August 25, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Epstein had that much in wire transfers, but none documented from the idiot (so far)
Try their "Impretzivly Fudged" for some delicious salty / sweet action.
August 21, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Try their "Impretzivly Fudged" for some delicious salty / sweet action.
I'm open to the concept that I'm not getting the concept, but it sounds to me like you're saying "They have a Nazi on their side... we need to counter that... with... a... a *good* Nazi!"
August 2, 2025 at 6:44 PM
I'm open to the concept that I'm not getting the concept, but it sounds to me like you're saying "They have a Nazi on their side... we need to counter that... with... a... a *good* Nazi!"
I sure don't have any insight into the PUA or manosphere subcultures, but as a formerly horny guy, I wonder if a lot of the defining features of those derive from just not getting laid enough, for some value of "enough", like the resentment, and the desire for control.
August 2, 2025 at 6:33 PM
I sure don't have any insight into the PUA or manosphere subcultures, but as a formerly horny guy, I wonder if a lot of the defining features of those derive from just not getting laid enough, for some value of "enough", like the resentment, and the desire for control.
Hmm, sarcasm, you say? Fortunately, there's a handy test that anyone can use to vet such a claim: how would the Rs feel if Obama had said it?
July 28, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Hmm, sarcasm, you say? Fortunately, there's a handy test that anyone can use to vet such a claim: how would the Rs feel if Obama had said it?
Gonna have to disqualify this one, the issue is not whether there are clients (there are), the issue is whether T* was a client (he was, don't get me wrong, but those are two different issues)
July 24, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Gonna have to disqualify this one, the issue is not whether there are clients (there are), the issue is whether T* was a client (he was, don't get me wrong, but those are two different issues)
Moreover, Carthago Delenda Est
July 23, 2025 at 1:36 AM
Moreover, Carthago Delenda Est
You can't argue with that logic...
July 23, 2025 at 1:33 AM
You can't argue with that logic...
Man, I couldn't lie that hard if I tried, and even if I could, I wouldn't be able to keep it up. Keep in mind that I am asking this rhetorically: have you *no* shame? I mean, not even some crumbs at the bottom of the box?
July 21, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Man, I couldn't lie that hard if I tried, and even if I could, I wouldn't be able to keep it up. Keep in mind that I am asking this rhetorically: have you *no* shame? I mean, not even some crumbs at the bottom of the box?
You absolutely*can* go wrong by being transparent...
...if you're implicated thereby.
...if you're implicated thereby.
July 16, 2025 at 2:54 AM
You absolutely*can* go wrong by being transparent...
...if you're implicated thereby.
...if you're implicated thereby.