Very exciting work!

"Simple" tools in the same loop as the experiment along with thoughtful, common sense approaches (like focusing on individuals instead of consortia). That's really powerful. That's how you translate. And there aren't a lot of groups that do all of experiment and tools and theory well.

7/

Be honest. You've written the same thing a dozen times.

But in my defense, I felt like I did my part -- wrote about a tool. Made some observation. Now let other people figure out how to apply it. Fin [at least my contribution].

That's such a copout! How do we get away with saying these things? 3/

But every one of those papers has the same throwaway statement somewhere.

It goes sort of like this: "in principle, this tool could be used in future studies for biomarkers or for helping better understand [your favorite disorder]."

Those statements are trite and essentially meaningless. 2/

From 30+ years of suffering to sustained relief thanks to personalized brain maps + adaptive stimulation

PACE – an approach for a personalized brain pacemaker

Insights on how decades of basic science in fMRI and cognitive science can lead to real breakthroughs in medicine