Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

1.2K followers 3.2K following 390 posts

Scottish Writer/Director
Quarterfinalist 2021 @goldenscriptnet, @screencrafting
Semi-finalist @FilmarkethubTV Pilot 2021
Currently doing an MLitt in Creative Writing at Strathclyde Uni.
www.fraserdenholm.com

Posts Replies Media Videos

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

Some OC dance poses

August 2, 2025 at 7:37 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

Here we go!

April 23, 2025 at 8:12 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

'You wouldn't steal a car' from the old Anti-Piracy DVD intros

April 8, 2025 at 8:47 AM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

February 27, 2025 at 9:29 AM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

They mostly come at night... Mostly #aliens #ripley #newt

January 2, 2025 at 8:49 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

Watched Furiosa last night. Quite enjoyed it so had a wee go at drawing her.

December 28, 2024 at 2:43 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

December 24, 2024 at 9:53 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

Time for the Christmas Eve ritual.

December 24, 2024 at 9:51 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

And here's some of the sketches she's based on.

Several sketches of an original character.

December 22, 2024 at 1:13 AM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

A little character test render of my OC #b3d #blender

December 22, 2024 at 1:00 AM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

Am I reading this correctly? Is it proposing that copyright on original works can be ignored by AI companies, but that AI generated slop DOES have copyright protections?

D.1 Computer-generated works: protection for the outputs of generative AI
126. It is possible for the outputs of AI models to be protected by copyright. Three different types of protection may apply, depending on the type of output and how it was created.

127. First, output may qualify as a literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic work (an “authorial work”), under section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA). To be so protected it must be original, in the sense that it is the intellectual creation of its author, reflecting their personality and creative choices.

128. In general, any work made using AI as a tool, but where the creative essence of the work comes from a human creator will fall in this category. An example could be where someone uses Adobe’s Generative Fill tool to make edits to their own photograph. This would qualify for copyright under section 1(1)(a), based on originality in the photograph.

129. We will refer to such works as “AI-assisted works” – works with a human creator, making use of an AI tool. They are protected in similar terms in the EU and the US as they are in the UK.

130. Secondly, output may qualify as a sound recording, film, broadcast, or published edition. Such “entrepreneurial works” do not need to be original to benefit from protection. As such, a recording of AI-generated music will benefit from protection regardless of the degree of human input into that music. The owner of rights in such a work is the person who made arrangements for it to be produced.

December 21, 2024 at 12:21 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

Here's a wee screenshot of an animation project I'm working on in blender. #b3d

A rendered image from Blender 3d of a New York Street with a man crossing behind a taxi

December 17, 2024 at 11:50 PM

Fraser Denholm

@fraserdenholm.bsky.social

My beautiful new @davidlafuente.bsky.social Princess Leia print arrived yesterday from @thegreenroom.bsky.social. Looking amazing. Just need to decide which bit of wall space it's going to live.