Frank Wong
@frankjwong.bsky.social
he/him
I code. I write. I build Legos. I watch baseball. Fitbit enthusiast. My comments are my own.
I code. I write. I build Legos. I watch baseball. Fitbit enthusiast. My comments are my own.
Bing maps still calls it Gulf of Mexico, maybe it's time to switch?
February 11, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Bing maps still calls it Gulf of Mexico, maybe it's time to switch?
Bing maps still uses Gulf of Mexico, maybe it's time people switched.
February 11, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Bing maps still uses Gulf of Mexico, maybe it's time people switched.
I didn't say 9 Lego *bricks* tall, I specifically said 9 Lego *studs* tall.
A Lego stud is precisely 8mm wide; the monolith needs to be precisely 72mm tall, which you can't do with Lego bricks. 7+tile gets you pretty close though.
Apologies, I *am* a Lego geek after all.
A Lego stud is precisely 8mm wide; the monolith needs to be precisely 72mm tall, which you can't do with Lego bricks. 7+tile gets you pretty close though.
Apologies, I *am* a Lego geek after all.
January 31, 2025 at 11:26 PM
I didn't say 9 Lego *bricks* tall, I specifically said 9 Lego *studs* tall.
A Lego stud is precisely 8mm wide; the monolith needs to be precisely 72mm tall, which you can't do with Lego bricks. 7+tile gets you pretty close though.
Apologies, I *am* a Lego geek after all.
A Lego stud is precisely 8mm wide; the monolith needs to be precisely 72mm tall, which you can't do with Lego bricks. 7+tile gets you pretty close though.
Apologies, I *am* a Lego geek after all.
Okay, tell me what benefit this serves. Any particular reason why little boys should be in the presence of women wearing skimpy outfits... parading their bodies for men's amusement?
No reason? Should we disallow it then?
No reason? Should we disallow it then?
December 3, 2024 at 11:44 PM
Okay, tell me what benefit this serves. Any particular reason why little boys should be in the presence of women wearing skimpy outfits... parading their bodies for men's amusement?
No reason? Should we disallow it then?
No reason? Should we disallow it then?
No, I looked it up.
The DEFINITION of grooming is with the intent of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act.
First, cross-dressing is not illegal.
Second, drag queens do not disproportionately sexually assault children more than others.
The DEFINITION of grooming is with the intent of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act.
First, cross-dressing is not illegal.
Second, drag queens do not disproportionately sexually assault children more than others.
December 3, 2024 at 11:37 PM
No, I looked it up.
The DEFINITION of grooming is with the intent of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act.
First, cross-dressing is not illegal.
Second, drag queens do not disproportionately sexually assault children more than others.
The DEFINITION of grooming is with the intent of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act.
First, cross-dressing is not illegal.
Second, drag queens do not disproportionately sexually assault children more than others.
This is a picture of Mildred and Richard Loving. In the 1950's, it was illegal for them to be married, so they were imprisoned.
Virgina argued before SCOTUS, that mixed marriages should be disallowed to 'protect the children'.
Do you see anything wrong with them TODAY? Times change.
Virgina argued before SCOTUS, that mixed marriages should be disallowed to 'protect the children'.
Do you see anything wrong with them TODAY? Times change.
December 3, 2024 at 10:34 PM
This is a picture of Mildred and Richard Loving. In the 1950's, it was illegal for them to be married, so they were imprisoned.
Virgina argued before SCOTUS, that mixed marriages should be disallowed to 'protect the children'.
Do you see anything wrong with them TODAY? Times change.
Virgina argued before SCOTUS, that mixed marriages should be disallowed to 'protect the children'.
Do you see anything wrong with them TODAY? Times change.
You keep saying that term "groom" which I assume means this.
Where you basically imply that people in drag are disproportionately more likely to sexually assault children and are, in fact, interacting which children towards that end.
Where you basically imply that people in drag are disproportionately more likely to sexually assault children and are, in fact, interacting which children towards that end.
December 3, 2024 at 8:53 PM
You keep saying that term "groom" which I assume means this.
Where you basically imply that people in drag are disproportionately more likely to sexually assault children and are, in fact, interacting which children towards that end.
Where you basically imply that people in drag are disproportionately more likely to sexually assault children and are, in fact, interacting which children towards that end.