Frame Change
@framechange.bsky.social
It seems picking incompetent people to do things that require all the i's to be dotted and the t's to be crossed isn't such a brilliant move after all; but they can't ever admit their wrong, and will whine on about something else instead.
7/7
7/7
November 20, 2025 at 9:09 PM
It seems picking incompetent people to do things that require all the i's to be dotted and the t's to be crossed isn't such a brilliant move after all; but they can't ever admit their wrong, and will whine on about something else instead.
7/7
7/7
The cherry on top is not to acknowledge that she messed up and was wrong, but it is being mad that they aren't supporting her and calling it right, and are thus "hanging her out to dry".
Everything is a political sports game to these people.
6/
Everything is a political sports game to these people.
6/
November 20, 2025 at 9:08 PM
The cherry on top is not to acknowledge that she messed up and was wrong, but it is being mad that they aren't supporting her and calling it right, and are thus "hanging her out to dry".
Everything is a political sports game to these people.
6/
Everything is a political sports game to these people.
6/
She didn't do that; she made up her own process as she went along, and it was found out.
We have rules and procedures in court for a reason, but if it suits them, they think they can do whatever they want.
Now they are mad that making it up instead of following the rules has consequences.
5/
We have rules and procedures in court for a reason, but if it suits them, they think they can do whatever they want.
Now they are mad that making it up instead of following the rules has consequences.
5/
November 20, 2025 at 9:05 PM
She didn't do that; she made up her own process as she went along, and it was found out.
We have rules and procedures in court for a reason, but if it suits them, they think they can do whatever they want.
Now they are mad that making it up instead of following the rules has consequences.
5/
We have rules and procedures in court for a reason, but if it suits them, they think they can do whatever they want.
Now they are mad that making it up instead of following the rules has consequences.
5/
[Ed. note: Why are they all such windbags?]
Okay, lots to consider here, and most of it is amusing.
First, nothing was *done* to Halligan at all -- it is what *she did* that is under scrutiny.
There is a way the Grand Jury works, and what she should have done was get the FULL GJ to revote.
4/
Okay, lots to consider here, and most of it is amusing.
First, nothing was *done* to Halligan at all -- it is what *she did* that is under scrutiny.
There is a way the Grand Jury works, and what she should have done was get the FULL GJ to revote.
4/
November 20, 2025 at 9:02 PM
[Ed. note: Why are they all such windbags?]
Okay, lots to consider here, and most of it is amusing.
First, nothing was *done* to Halligan at all -- it is what *she did* that is under scrutiny.
There is a way the Grand Jury works, and what she should have done was get the FULL GJ to revote.
4/
Okay, lots to consider here, and most of it is amusing.
First, nothing was *done* to Halligan at all -- it is what *she did* that is under scrutiny.
There is a way the Grand Jury works, and what she should have done was get the FULL GJ to revote.
4/
[..cont]
And by the way, where are the people who should be standing with her right now instead of leaving her out to dry?
===
Link do original post:
x.com/HansMahncke/...
3/
And by the way, where are the people who should be standing with her right now instead of leaving her out to dry?
===
Link do original post:
x.com/HansMahncke/...
3/
Hans Mahncke on X: "What they’re doing to Lindsey Halligan is absolutely despicable. There were three indictments, two were approved, so she set aside the one that wasn’t, got the foreperson’s signature, and moved forward. That’s it. And yet they’re all acting like she committed some kind of" / X
What they’re doing to Lindsey Halligan is absolutely despicable. There were three indictments, two were approved, so she set aside the one that wasn’t, got the foreperson’s signature, and moved forward. That’s it. And yet they’re all acting like she committed some kind of
x.com
November 20, 2025 at 8:59 PM
[..cont]
And by the way, where are the people who should be standing with her right now instead of leaving her out to dry?
===
Link do original post:
x.com/HansMahncke/...
3/
And by the way, where are the people who should be standing with her right now instead of leaving her out to dry?
===
Link do original post:
x.com/HansMahncke/...
3/
[..cont]
And yet they’re all acting like she committed some kind of monstrous offense, which is exactly what happens to any Trump appointee who actually tries to carry out the mandate they were elected to deliver instead of playing it safe, mouthing platitudes, and accomplishing nothing.
[cont..]
2/
And yet they’re all acting like she committed some kind of monstrous offense, which is exactly what happens to any Trump appointee who actually tries to carry out the mandate they were elected to deliver instead of playing it safe, mouthing platitudes, and accomplishing nothing.
[cont..]
2/
November 20, 2025 at 8:57 PM
[..cont]
And yet they’re all acting like she committed some kind of monstrous offense, which is exactly what happens to any Trump appointee who actually tries to carry out the mandate they were elected to deliver instead of playing it safe, mouthing platitudes, and accomplishing nothing.
[cont..]
2/
And yet they’re all acting like she committed some kind of monstrous offense, which is exactly what happens to any Trump appointee who actually tries to carry out the mandate they were elected to deliver instead of playing it safe, mouthing platitudes, and accomplishing nothing.
[cont..]
2/
Sacks should be ashamed to amplify such bad takes; but if he had shame, he wouldn't be where he is now, right?
6/6
6/6
November 19, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Sacks should be ashamed to amplify such bad takes; but if he had shame, he wouldn't be where he is now, right?
6/6
6/6
Except that CEOs and tech leaders have been talking all about them not needing "juniors" anymore, as AI can fulfill that role.
And it's not like Sacks isn't aware of this; he's definitely adjacent to the Silicon Valley tech bros that champion this; it's the same crypto positive dudes too.
5/
And it's not like Sacks isn't aware of this; he's definitely adjacent to the Silicon Valley tech bros that champion this; it's the same crypto positive dudes too.
5/
November 19, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Except that CEOs and tech leaders have been talking all about them not needing "juniors" anymore, as AI can fulfill that role.
And it's not like Sacks isn't aware of this; he's definitely adjacent to the Silicon Valley tech bros that champion this; it's the same crypto positive dudes too.
5/
And it's not like Sacks isn't aware of this; he's definitely adjacent to the Silicon Valley tech bros that champion this; it's the same crypto positive dudes too.
5/
So, the technology that does best in knowledge industries hasn't "disrupted" things like blue collar work? I'm super surprised.
This isn't a serious study, it's something for AI boosters to use to say "see, AI isn't replacing humans".
4/
This isn't a serious study, it's something for AI boosters to use to say "see, AI isn't replacing humans".
4/
November 19, 2025 at 9:21 PM
So, the technology that does best in knowledge industries hasn't "disrupted" things like blue collar work? I'm super surprised.
This isn't a serious study, it's something for AI boosters to use to say "see, AI isn't replacing humans".
4/
This isn't a serious study, it's something for AI boosters to use to say "see, AI isn't replacing humans".
4/
This would be some heavy-hitting info, except it goes against what we actually know -- That the IT industry has been shedding workers like CRAZY.
But buried in the text, it clearly states that this trend has not affected "the broader labor market".
3/
But buried in the text, it clearly states that this trend has not affected "the broader labor market".
3/
November 19, 2025 at 9:17 PM
This would be some heavy-hitting info, except it goes against what we actually know -- That the IT industry has been shedding workers like CRAZY.
But buried in the text, it clearly states that this trend has not affected "the broader labor market".
3/
But buried in the text, it clearly states that this trend has not affected "the broader labor market".
3/
This is why stunts like this are dumb -- because without being curious, and knowing the WHOLE story, you can come up with hot takes that seem smart but are actual hurtful in ways you didn't even understand.
Par for the course for influencers on the right, unfortunately.
6/6
Par for the course for influencers on the right, unfortunately.
6/6
November 19, 2025 at 9:11 PM
This is why stunts like this are dumb -- because without being curious, and knowing the WHOLE story, you can come up with hot takes that seem smart but are actual hurtful in ways you didn't even understand.
Par for the course for influencers on the right, unfortunately.
6/6
Par for the course for influencers on the right, unfortunately.
6/6
Those people employ a lot of people, and ALL of those people are voters. From a practical standpoint, they'd all take big haircuts, and that won't play well.
It does a general good as well, of course -- but even if recipients vote, they are someplace else, so don't figure in as much.
5/
It does a general good as well, of course -- but even if recipients vote, they are someplace else, so don't figure in as much.
5/
November 19, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Those people employ a lot of people, and ALL of those people are voters. From a practical standpoint, they'd all take big haircuts, and that won't play well.
It does a general good as well, of course -- but even if recipients vote, they are someplace else, so don't figure in as much.
5/
It does a general good as well, of course -- but even if recipients vote, they are someplace else, so don't figure in as much.
5/
Now, I'm sure he got lots of cute soundbites and it plays up the MAGA base -- get those FREELOADERS off my dime!
But the issue is that the money being spent goes into the hands of food producers and distributors, giving them a healthy base income.
4/
But the issue is that the money being spent goes into the hands of food producers and distributors, giving them a healthy base income.
4/
November 19, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Now, I'm sure he got lots of cute soundbites and it plays up the MAGA base -- get those FREELOADERS off my dime!
But the issue is that the money being spent goes into the hands of food producers and distributors, giving them a healthy base income.
4/
But the issue is that the money being spent goes into the hands of food producers and distributors, giving them a healthy base income.
4/
Now, a lot of the way these far-right influencers make money is by rage-baiting people to react to their dumb insanity.
That's what this is, for sure.
Not even the most hardcore GOP elected official would suggest ending SNAP full stop.
It's political suicide.
3/
That's what this is, for sure.
Not even the most hardcore GOP elected official would suggest ending SNAP full stop.
It's political suicide.
3/
November 19, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Now, a lot of the way these far-right influencers make money is by rage-baiting people to react to their dumb insanity.
That's what this is, for sure.
Not even the most hardcore GOP elected official would suggest ending SNAP full stop.
It's political suicide.
3/
That's what this is, for sure.
Not even the most hardcore GOP elected official would suggest ending SNAP full stop.
It's political suicide.
3/
[...cont]
But he draws the line at hungry kids
[QT of Crowder at his table saying "we should end all SNAP benefits"]
===
Link to original post:
x.com/jlarkytweets...
2/
But he draws the line at hungry kids
[QT of Crowder at his table saying "we should end all SNAP benefits"]
===
Link to original post:
x.com/jlarkytweets...
2/
Josh Larky on X: "Steven Crowder took out $70,000 in PPP loans during Covid and didn’t repay any of it, even though he was already a millionaire Put another way, he was happy to pocket the equivalent of 33 years (!!) worth of SNAP benefits from the government But he draws the line at hungry kids" / X
Steven Crowder took out $70,000 in PPP loans during Covid and didn’t repay any of it, even though he was already a millionaire Put another way, he was happy to pocket the equivalent of 33 years (!!) worth of SNAP benefits from the government But he draws the line at hungry kids
x.com
November 19, 2025 at 9:02 PM
[...cont]
But he draws the line at hungry kids
[QT of Crowder at his table saying "we should end all SNAP benefits"]
===
Link to original post:
x.com/jlarkytweets...
2/
But he draws the line at hungry kids
[QT of Crowder at his table saying "we should end all SNAP benefits"]
===
Link to original post:
x.com/jlarkytweets...
2/
So, my thought is that NO ONE should feel SHAME for having something to eat, no matter HOW it is provided.
Mike and the douche nozzles want people without to feel indebted to them, like THEY personally were ponying up the money. Just an awful take.
4/4
Mike and the douche nozzles want people without to feel indebted to them, like THEY personally were ponying up the money. Just an awful take.
4/4
November 17, 2025 at 1:48 AM
So, my thought is that NO ONE should feel SHAME for having something to eat, no matter HOW it is provided.
Mike and the douche nozzles want people without to feel indebted to them, like THEY personally were ponying up the money. Just an awful take.
4/4
Mike and the douche nozzles want people without to feel indebted to them, like THEY personally were ponying up the money. Just an awful take.
4/4
So, let's talk about shame. Trump has no shame, his various cabinet secretaries have no shame, his comms staff have no shame and neither do his talking heads.
But all of a sudden this dude wants to talk about shame? Sure, uh huh.
3/
But all of a sudden this dude wants to talk about shame? Sure, uh huh.
3/
November 17, 2025 at 1:46 AM
So, let's talk about shame. Trump has no shame, his various cabinet secretaries have no shame, his comms staff have no shame and neither do his talking heads.
But all of a sudden this dude wants to talk about shame? Sure, uh huh.
3/
But all of a sudden this dude wants to talk about shame? Sure, uh huh.
3/
🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 on X: "We must bring back shame to welfare." / X
We must bring back shame to welfare.
x.com
November 17, 2025 at 1:44 AM
He COULD try, you know, to become a clergy member and work through the ranks -- but it's easier to be a crappy pundit and shout what you want from the sidelines.
Deep down, Matt isn't deeply committed to religion, he's deeply committed to his crappy opinions.
Just sad.
7/7
Deep down, Matt isn't deeply committed to religion, he's deeply committed to his crappy opinions.
Just sad.
7/7
November 16, 2025 at 6:10 AM
He COULD try, you know, to become a clergy member and work through the ranks -- but it's easier to be a crappy pundit and shout what you want from the sidelines.
Deep down, Matt isn't deeply committed to religion, he's deeply committed to his crappy opinions.
Just sad.
7/7
Deep down, Matt isn't deeply committed to religion, he's deeply committed to his crappy opinions.
Just sad.
7/7
I'll pause here to mention that the stuff under Biden was regarding a DIFFERENT Pope first, and then also mention that because you advocate for humane treatment for undocumented people doesn't mean you can't do other advocacy.
But, Matt's a goon, so he wants to curate what is done by the church.
6/
But, Matt's a goon, so he wants to curate what is done by the church.
6/
November 16, 2025 at 6:08 AM
I'll pause here to mention that the stuff under Biden was regarding a DIFFERENT Pope first, and then also mention that because you advocate for humane treatment for undocumented people doesn't mean you can't do other advocacy.
But, Matt's a goon, so he wants to curate what is done by the church.
6/
But, Matt's a goon, so he wants to curate what is done by the church.
6/