SCS @ CMU -> industry
homecare/cleaning product & compsci nerd
Avatar by Fleurfurr, banner by Mel Shaw
https://twitter.com/soft_fox_lad
He/him
Under the arrangement SpaceX had with the US Department of Defense at the time, the Department of Defense had control over where any service would take place *and* provided terminals with known IDs so that Ukraine could conduct an operation anywhere, with Lloyd Austin's approval.
Under the arrangement SpaceX had with the US Department of Defense at the time, the Department of Defense had control over where any service would take place *and* provided terminals with known IDs so that Ukraine could conduct an operation anywhere, with Lloyd Austin's approval.
NYTimes' reporting noted that DoD controlled its service area. It's on Austin & Sullivan. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
("KB" = Kyrylo Budanov, the guy who runs GUR)
NYTimes' reporting noted that DoD controlled its service area. It's on Austin & Sullivan. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
("KB" = Kyrylo Budanov, the guy who runs GUR)
If AirPods' DACs don't seem to keep AirPods Max from having less distortion than $2,000 Sennheiser headphones, then I don't think you can call Bluetooth a limiting factor here.
If AirPods' DACs don't seem to keep AirPods Max from having less distortion than $2,000 Sennheiser headphones, then I don't think you can call Bluetooth a limiting factor here.
But we can still address this quantitatively: take the error from a wired connection to a nice, inexpensive DAC (see below), and your favorite extremely expensive Bluetooth-compatible DAC, like the Chord Hugo 2
But we can still address this quantitatively: take the error from a wired connection to a nice, inexpensive DAC (see below), and your favorite extremely expensive Bluetooth-compatible DAC, like the Chord Hugo 2
For comparison, loss from Bluetooth codecs, in actually-challenging situations, e.g. encoding noise. Notice how in any situation w/human-perceptible loss, the expensive DAC does worse (often much worse) than high-bitrate Bluetooth codecs.
For comparison, loss from Bluetooth codecs, in actually-challenging situations, e.g. encoding noise. Notice how in any situation w/human-perceptible loss, the expensive DAC does worse (often much worse) than high-bitrate Bluetooth codecs.
It's not a matter of opinion. Apple's AAC codec is better than LDAC 990 (pic 1, pic 2), aptX, Android's AAC (by far), and any other similar Android codec.
It's not a matter of opinion. Apple's AAC codec is better than LDAC 990 (pic 1, pic 2), aptX, Android's AAC (by far), and any other similar Android codec.
It just looked so nice on the Nokia OLED screens.
It just looked so nice on the Nokia OLED screens.
2) the second order effects of this are going to be catastrophic if congress does not intervene
2) the second order effects of this are going to be catastrophic if congress does not intervene
Seems like the child in the study w/who has been undetectable the longest is still 10 months shy of that.
Seems like the child in the study w/who has been undetectable the longest is still 10 months shy of that.
(n.b. I’m using clearsky)
(n.b. I’m using clearsky)