Okay so by "pre-historical" you mean "I imagined it and there's no evidence", dang.
Though true I did mean non-ownership more than anti-ownership; semantic error on my part.

True, and copyright infringement is not theft

You are a weird person with bad ideas on how life works, bye.

If the goal of the competition is to make the most money, then $1 would win even if most potential customers chose free.

The funniest line for me was "Everything oozes. Never the same pus from one second to the next" I truly broke out laughing it got me so good.
Definitely not something I could've appreciated when I was younger.

What machine do you mean?

Actually I do wanna ask: what societies? Non-rhetorical question I would love to learn more aboot anti-ownership societies.
Every example of feudalism (were there non-tyrannical feudalisms?) I know did revolve strongly around the concept of ownership.

Okay so aside from being some very bad analogies for downloading a copy of something off the internet, I don't have a car or get paychecks so like, yeah go ahead.
Kinda funny that you are trying to scare me into imagining the life I already live (which ain't even bad)

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt here and clarify that when I said "taking" I meant like, digitally copying something that you posted online. Not like, physically taking possession of a one-of-a-kind carving.
That should clear everything up.

From what I understand BPD is basically a collection of trauma symptoms rather than a distinct disorder. I know people who've been diagnosed to gain access to supports and also people who have deliberately avoided diagnosis to avoid losing access to supports.

I think people have been told "The Middle Class is Good. It is Good to to be Middle Class" so often that when anything suggests that the upper class might turn you against the lower class is seen as like, offensive.
Binary christian morality to blame here too somewhere I'm sure

Extremely valid, I don't even want to be a prescriptivist and say like "this is what this term used to mean and should mean it forever". But the motive to erase the term seems to come from like, hurt feelings and not striving for an improved model so it ends up annoying me a lot.

Also this whole thing is aboot piracy. Copying it and even "selling" it for free is not theft, and has not been shown to even reduce sales.
Like I wonder how these people feel aboot libraries.

Are you talking to me?

Also, if you are selling your labour-power while the person who bought it controls what to do with the product and value your labour created that's like, blatantly proletarian. The difference here is selling your labour vs selling a product. This admittedly gets messy because technology changes.

To be honest, I hate trying to convey ideas with such a restrictive text limit so I'm not like, enthusiastically clarifying. But: petty booj doesn't mean booj, even their "aligned interests" are imagined as the petty wishes they weren't.

I saw a post that described independant artists as seeing themselves as "temporarily Vivsiepops" and nothing has felt truer