Farbod Akhlaghi
banner
farbod-a.bsky.social
Farbod Akhlaghi
@farbod-a.bsky.social
Assistant Professor in Moral Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin. Former Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge. DPhil (PhD) from Oxford. Moral Philosophy & Metaphysics. #philosophy #PhilSky
For a downloadable and sharable PDF version, please see here: 1000wordphilosophy.com/wp-content/u...
1000wordphilosophy.com
November 28, 2025 at 3:56 PM
The details of the call are through the link below; please share with anyone who might be interested! Note: the applications are very competitive and each member of staff is permitted to support at most one candidate per scheme. 2/2 listserv.liv.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa?A...
LISTSERV 16.5 - PHILOS-L Archives
listserv.liv.ac.uk
July 29, 2025 at 7:53 AM
Along the way, I identify what needs to be done for a view like Amir's to be made more plausible – whilst doubting this can be achieved – and an interesting lacuna in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion about Islam that deserves much more attention!
May 15, 2025 at 6:18 AM
Saemi offers an ingenious 'ethics-first' solution: take these morally controversial Scriptural passages to include not moral permissions and requirements, but legal ones. I argue that this solution will not work, specifically for a Muslim or, indeed, any theist.
May 15, 2025 at 6:18 AM
The topic is the problem of divinely prescribed evil: how, if at all, a theist can reconcile their belief that Scripture is the word of God, and that their moral judgements are reliable, with Scriptural injunctions that appear to permit and require evil actions.
May 15, 2025 at 6:18 AM
The topic is the problem of divinely prescribed evil: how, if at all, a theist can reconcile their belief that Scripture is the word of God with, and that their moral judgements are reliable, with Scriptural injunctions that appear to permit and require evil actions.
May 15, 2025 at 6:13 AM
Along the way, I identify what needs to be done for a view like Amir's to be made more plausible – whilst doubting this can be achieved – and an interesting lacuna in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion about Islam that deserves much more attention!
May 15, 2025 at 6:08 AM
Saemi offers an ingenious 'ethics-first' solution: take these morally controversial Scriptural passages to include not moral permissions and requirements, but legal ones. I argue that this solution will not work, specifically for a Muslim or, indeed, any theist.
May 15, 2025 at 6:08 AM
The topic is the problem of divinely prescribed evil: how, if at all, a theist can reconcile their belief that Scripture is the word of God with, and that their moral judgements are reliable, with Scriptural injunctions that appear to permit and require evil actions.
May 15, 2025 at 6:08 AM