Stig Eidissen
@eidissen.bsky.social
PhD EU State Aid law. Attorney at the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities. Associate professor at UiT Arctic University of Norway.
I work and research within State aid law, privacy law, employment law and other topics of interest.
I work and research within State aid law, privacy law, employment law and other topics of interest.
This is - of course - lost on the current administration, who in line with russian propaganda on Europe, bizzarrely promotes radical Putin-friendly political parties as the "protectors" of European culture.
December 5, 2025 at 10:44 AM
This is - of course - lost on the current administration, who in line with russian propaganda on Europe, bizzarrely promotes radical Putin-friendly political parties as the "protectors" of European culture.
Reposted by Stig Eidissen
This chart (which applies even more to social media than it did to TV) lives in my head rent free.
Social media enveloping traditional media means everything and everyone is now competing in the entertainment market. Boring stuff like policy that affects millions of lives doesn’t stand a chance.
Social media enveloping traditional media means everything and everyone is now competing in the entertainment market. Boring stuff like policy that affects millions of lives doesn’t stand a chance.
November 23, 2025 at 8:24 PM
This chart (which applies even more to social media than it did to TV) lives in my head rent free.
Social media enveloping traditional media means everything and everyone is now competing in the entertainment market. Boring stuff like policy that affects millions of lives doesn’t stand a chance.
Social media enveloping traditional media means everything and everyone is now competing in the entertainment market. Boring stuff like policy that affects millions of lives doesn’t stand a chance.
Presumably Financial Times didnt use Russian sources here?
(The support in the wider administration outside Witkoff's team may be another question of course)
@christopherjm.ft.com
(The support in the wider administration outside Witkoff's team may be another question of course)
@christopherjm.ft.com
November 20, 2025 at 8:32 AM
Presumably Financial Times didnt use Russian sources here?
(The support in the wider administration outside Witkoff's team may be another question of course)
@christopherjm.ft.com
(The support in the wider administration outside Witkoff's team may be another question of course)
@christopherjm.ft.com
Reposted by Stig Eidissen
Now the phrase ‘American security guarantees’ is being thrown around, which frankly means nothing, especially under the current administration.
Handing an invading army of torturers, rapists, and murderers everything they want won’t bring peace, it will only encourage them to do it again.
Handing an invading army of torturers, rapists, and murderers everything they want won’t bring peace, it will only encourage them to do it again.
November 20, 2025 at 6:21 AM
Now the phrase ‘American security guarantees’ is being thrown around, which frankly means nothing, especially under the current administration.
Handing an invading army of torturers, rapists, and murderers everything they want won’t bring peace, it will only encourage them to do it again.
Handing an invading army of torturers, rapists, and murderers everything they want won’t bring peace, it will only encourage them to do it again.