Dan Przygoda
banner
dprzygoda.bsky.social
Dan Przygoda
@dprzygoda.bsky.social
Award-winning journalist. Formerly with @January6thCmte. I also direct #synthwave music videos, commercials & films. Opinions my own. www.zb4y.com
“No one had high expectations for her” gee…that sounds like code to me 🤔🤔🤔
November 21, 2025 at 6:14 PM
So she failed at a made-up issue?
I’m just going off your statements.
She didn’t have anything to do as VP except immigration, which she failed at…but it’s a made up issue anyway?
November 21, 2025 at 6:08 PM
So you didn’t vote for her bc of her immigration policy…you would have liked her to be stronger on that, something Republicans want too…
November 21, 2025 at 6:03 PM
“She didn’t deliver on a policy…” you know she was VP, right?
Can you explain to me, in detail, the role of the VP.
November 21, 2025 at 5:57 PM
You came into our mentions, buddy. You can show yourself the door at any time.
November 21, 2025 at 5:50 PM
But she was. I’m sorry you have trouble dealing with reality.
November 21, 2025 at 5:49 PM
No, you’ve never had any legitimacy because you haven’t won any elections. You guys should do some soul searching and figure out why that is. Couldn’t be your toxic personalities, could it?
November 21, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Yeah? And what did you do to encourage people to vote for her?
What conversations did you have with people who were on the fence?
November 21, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Isn’t it interesting how all these types who were shouting about how they couldn’t vote for her or were encouraging others not to, now claim they did in fact vote for her?
Are they lying now or were they lying before?
They’re just mad they’re rightfully getting blamed for what’s happening
November 21, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Post mortems are fine. Lying about or being ignorant about her past experiences and accomplishments is not.
Hope you can understand the difference
November 21, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Let’s see: she won her election for DA in San Francisco, she won her election for Attorney General for California, she won her Senate election.
But yeah, keep dismissing the accomplishments of the Black woman, it’s a real good look for you.
November 21, 2025 at 4:36 PM
They’re willing to burn it down bc they know they’re privileged enough not to be the first ones affected by any negative consequences from that.
November 20, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Then you are responsible for and should enjoy everything that’s happening now. Congratulations.
November 20, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Oh absolutely. And isn’t it interesting how the “single issue voter” on that side SUDDENLY “cares” about a whole bunch of other issues now? (You know, like the ones we were telling them to worry about if Trump got back in office)
November 20, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Except that’s not a valid critique.
So tell us: what policy concessions did Kamala make to get the Cheney endorsement?
November 20, 2025 at 9:34 PM
That’s a load of crap. She pitched a ton of programs aimed at working class families (huge first time home buying credit, continue to forgive student loans, child tax credits to name a few) but uh, guess because it didn’t come from Papa Bernie, it didn’t count, right? 😉
November 20, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Cool, the replies to my previous posts about this are rotten with them.
November 20, 2025 at 6:10 PM
Oh I wholeheartedly agree…but when you point that out to them, they crash out.
November 20, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Yup! Anytime I asked one of these types: “Ok, so what policy concessions did Kamala make to get this endorsement? What policy did Liz Cheney demand she adopt?” They of course can’t answer.
November 20, 2025 at 4:23 PM