DJ Crimson
banner
djcrimson.bsky.social
DJ Crimson
@djcrimson.bsky.social
If you ask me, “Where’s Oakland?” I’ll tell you it’s in my heart.
Nice, gonna have to check it out!
November 29, 2025 at 4:02 AM
What’s it called?
November 29, 2025 at 3:26 AM
…economics, culture, geography, etc. ”Make better buildings, and make sure they blend in to their surroundings” is meaningless and unworkable guidance.
November 26, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Seems worth acknowledging that only upzoning corridors is suboptimal from a livability, integration, and public health standpoint. (Maybe your paper says this, didn’t see it noted in the thread.)
November 25, 2025 at 10:48 PM
My understanding is that, to the extent they take soft local funds at all, for-profit developers are much better at paying back residual receipts loans.
November 25, 2025 at 2:55 AM
No, but it’s an extraordinary step to forgive them in full less than 10 years after being issued, and shows that they were toxic assets from the start.
November 25, 2025 at 2:52 AM
There’s no meaningful way for the public to assess the performance of the City Attorney, with the minor exception of when they sign off on an ordinance that could bankrupt the City.
November 24, 2025 at 6:55 PM
Yeesh, that story is nuts. Where was the City Attorney’s Office when Council considered this item??
November 24, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Reposted by DJ Crimson
San Francisco's small sites preservation program is the same for what i've seen. The portfolios nonprofits have assembled of these old, small, rent controlled properties are collectively AT BEST just breaking even, which is highly risky for leveraged properties with no upside to offset that risk.
November 24, 2025 at 2:37 PM
EBALDC pioneered this form of acq/preservation in Oakland and mostly regrets it, but Nikki Bas expanded it and used it to fail upwards into her Supervisor seat.
November 24, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Realizing that I probably should have googled this before commenting.
November 24, 2025 at 8:02 AM
I’m currently agnostic about FAR, but I wonder what its history is. Who developed it and what was its original purpose?
November 24, 2025 at 7:59 AM
Money pits. $8M could have leveraged the redevelopment of those properties into new construction at 2x the density. There‘s a cost to the obsession with preservation.
November 24, 2025 at 7:54 AM
This feels like where California was at with Housing Element law 20 years ago. A toothless paper exercise.
November 21, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Happy to say I muted him ever since he lost his race for dogcatcher despite raising a trillion dollars and facing an unknown.
November 20, 2025 at 4:07 PM