CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
LightNews LightNews
cyberwillow.bsky.social
CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
@cyberwillow.bsky.social
52 followers 140 following 20 posts
She/Her, absolutely 0 consistsency to what I post. But you are here so thats on you.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
crowwkui.bsky.social
it's gelphie time
November 12, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
themckenziest.gay
Ummmmmmmmmm
Call to activism account posting a clip from cnn and this is the text: HOLY SHIT: The UK - our closest ally since WWl - just cut off ALL intelligence sharing with the U.S. about Caribbean drug trafficking boats, calling the strikes illegal. Britain doesn't trust us anymore. Trump has torched a century of friendship while he sucks up to dictators.
November 11, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
emilymcminn-ms.bsky.social
Nothing illustrates the arseholery of the IOC and the British Press more than the use of the image of a not-Trans woman to illustrate a story about trans women being banned (because there are no current trans women competing at this level)
screen grab of Sun Sport artilce about IOC ban for trans women including a picture of Cisgender Boxer Imame Khelife
November 10, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
esqueer.net
We fucking told you so.
Alt text: Screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter). At the top is a tweet by a verified account named “Richard Hanania,” saying: “It’s become clear that an obsession with trans stuff, while looking somewhat reasonable at the time, was a red flag for having real psychological issues.” Below it is an embedded tweet from another verified account, “Matt Walsh,” dated Nov 10, stating: “This is correct. Everything that’s happened over the past two months has signaled to the left that assassinations work. Take out one of our leaders and we’ll start eating each other. That’s the message we’ve conveyed, loud and clear. And it puts us in serious …” The bottom of the screenshot shows the timestamp, date, and view count.
November 11, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
katelynburns.com
I'll get back to "party unity" as soon as the Senate Minority Leader tells us if he voted for the Democratic party nominee for mayor of his city.

I'm tired of party unity only ever running one way.
November 10, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
numb.comfortab.ly
REPUBLICANS: Democrats are antichrists and must be put against the wall.

DEMOCRATS: Let's work together with our friends across the aisle.
December 18, 2024 at 1:26 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
jael.bsky.social
this @katelynburns.com piece about the death of lia smith deserves your full attention

www.teenvogue.com/story/politi...
Politicizing Transgender Athletes Is Dangerous. Lia Smith Deserved Better.
"Let her passing be an inflection point for how you think about trans rights and trans people more generally."
www.teenvogue.com
November 10, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
rincewind.run
"Dems cannot successfully cave because John Cornyn got trapped in a broom closet" would be easily the funniest way for tonight to end
schnorkles.bsky.social Schnorkles O'Bork @schnorkles.bsky.social · 2d
Update: They can't find Cornyn.
November 10, 2025 at 3:02 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
luigithirty.bsky.social
the khan has exercised liberum veto. i think that means he gets 10 cavalry divisions at 25% maintenance
govpritzker.illinois.gov Governor JB Pritzker @govpritzker.illinois.gov · 2d
This is not a deal — it's an empty promise.

Trump and his Republican Congress are making healthcare more expensive for the middle class and ending it for working families.

Time for Democrats to stand tall for affordable healthcare. www.politico.com/news/2025/11...
Senate reaches deal on ending the shutdown
Democrats are coalescing around a bipartisan agreement to fund the government.
www.politico.com
November 10, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
benrosen.bsky.social
you can see why fascism is so popular when the other option is The Loser Party That Loves Losing
November 10, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
evangreer.bsky.social
Dealer: alright everyone ante up

Chuck Schumer: I fold

Dealer: … we haven’t even dealt the hand yet

Chuck Schumer: I 👏 fold 👏
November 9, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
climatebrad.hillheat.com
Trump: I'm dismantling the Constitution, building a paramilitary fascist army loyal only to me, demolishing the White House, and blowing up the US economy for my billionaire cronies

Schumer: Okay, but you have to extend subsidies for corporate health care

Trump: No

Schumer: Okay
November 9, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
lexissketches.bsky.social
I wanted to create a new #Trans #pride themed #Nerfing sticker to replace my last 2 designs, however I am stuck on the catch-phrase! Originally I was going to put "NO NERF FOR TERFS", but my friends thought I could do something more catchy/fun. Suggestions?

#nerf #hvz #humansvszombies
November 9, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
glacierclear.bsky.social
the valenfield agenda
November 9, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
markjacob.bsky.social
One of the few positive aspects of this era in American history is that it's super-easy to identify the villains.
November 8, 2025 at 10:35 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
cait.bsky.social
"try to prove my AI isn't sentient"
okay, AI stop pretending to be sentient
AI: okey ☺️
November 8, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
malwaretech.com
This perfectly encapsulates how I feel living in the US. The republican party is an insane death cult, the democratic party is 3 corporations in a trench coat, and the "socialists" are just the completely normal left-wing capitalists you'd find in any of 2 dozen European nations.
Europeans recognize Zohran Mamdani’s supposedly radical policies as ‘normal’
Critics of New York City’s mayor-elect have said his pledges of free bus service and universal childcare are unrealistic, but in Europe it’s a given
www.theguardian.com
November 8, 2025 at 5:18 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
melstone.xyz
😈😈😈
November 7, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
hayao.lol
capitalism rules, I love doing extensive research any time I need to replace something because roughly 94% of all products are scam garbage
November 7, 2025 at 11:51 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
joshuaholland.bsky.social
Under new head of Paramount David Ellison, the studio has drawn up a list of actors who opposed the Gaza genocide and will not allow them to appear in its films and TV shows.

Does this sound familiar?

Also, "Ellison is reportedly aiming to take over Warner Bros. next."
Paramount Has Blacklist for Stars Deemed “Overtly Antisemitic” — World of Reel
It sure looks like the likes of Javier Bardem, Joaquin Phoenix, Emma Stone, and Mark Ruffalo won’t be making movies for Paramount in the foreseeable future.
www.worldofreel.com
November 6, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
nytpitchbot.bsky.social
Despite liberal hysteria, Charlie Kirk’s message was one of faith, family, and respectful debate. Here’s why so many of his followers have replaced him one-for-one with Nick Fuentes.
November 7, 2025 at 5:16 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
erininthemorning.com
The 6th Circuit has been competing to be the most anti-trans circuit in America and is now carving out a right to bully transgender kids.

Despicable.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 5d
BREAKING: The Sixth Circuit, in a 10-7 en banc decision, holds that an Ohio school district's anti-bullying policy that requires students to use children's preferred pronouns is likely unconstitutional on these facts.

Judge Murphy, a Trump appointee, writes the court's decision.
OPINION MURPHY, Circuit Judge. An Ohio public school district bars its students from referring to transgender and nonbinary classmates using the pronouns that match their biological sex if the classmates prefer to go by different pronouns. The plaintiff in this case has parent and student members who believe that a person's sex is immutable. The members want to express this view by using biological pronouns. And they believe that they would convey a falsehood —that a person's gender is fluid—if they use preferred pronouns. So the plaintiff challenged the school district's speech ban on behalf of its members under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause. This case about pronouns pits two important interests against each other. On the one hand, the school district has prohibited speech (biological pronouns) that expresses a message on a matter of pressing public concern. And because the district requires other speech (preferred pronouns) that expresses a competing view, it has discriminated based on its students' viewpoints. Its approach thus raises serious free-speech concerns. On the other hand, the school district rightly responds that it has a duty to protect all students- including transgender and nonbinary students— from bullying and harassment. And this protection, while necessarily restricting speech, does not violate the Free Speech Clause. So which of these competing concerns should prevail in this case? The Supreme Court's cases provide a clear answer. A school district may not restrict personal speech on matters of public concern unless the speech would "materially and substantially disrupt" school activities or infringe the legal "rights of others" in the school community. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969). In this case's current posture, the school district has fallen far short of meeting this demanding standard. It introduced no evidence that the use of biological pronouns would disrupt school functions or qualify as harassment under Ohio law. Our society continues to debate whether biological pronouns are appropriate or offensive just as it continues to debate many other issues surrounding transgender rights. The school district may not skew this debate by forcing one side to change the way it conveys its message or by compelling it to express a different view. We thus reverse and remand Case: 23-3630 Document: 253-2 Filed: 11/06/2025 Page: 4 No. 23-3630 Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Loc. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., et al. Page 4 for the entry of an appropriately tailored preliminary injunction barring the district from punishing students for the commonplace use of biological pronouns. Yet nothing we say here forecloses the district from enforcing its anti-harassment policies against the abuse of transgender students just as it enforces those policies against the abuse of all other students.
November 7, 2025 at 3:52 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
esqueer.net
As if the SCOTUS decision wasn't bad enough, the 6th circuit said "hold my beer" and explicitly created a constitutional right to bully trans kids who are already at tremendous risk of self harm and suicide.

These judges want dead trans kids.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 5d
BREAKING: The Sixth Circuit, in a 10-7 en banc decision, holds that an Ohio school district's anti-bullying policy that requires students to use children's preferred pronouns is likely unconstitutional on these facts.

Judge Murphy, a Trump appointee, writes the court's decision.
OPINION MURPHY, Circuit Judge. An Ohio public school district bars its students from referring to transgender and nonbinary classmates using the pronouns that match their biological sex if the classmates prefer to go by different pronouns. The plaintiff in this case has parent and student members who believe that a person's sex is immutable. The members want to express this view by using biological pronouns. And they believe that they would convey a falsehood —that a person's gender is fluid—if they use preferred pronouns. So the plaintiff challenged the school district's speech ban on behalf of its members under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause. This case about pronouns pits two important interests against each other. On the one hand, the school district has prohibited speech (biological pronouns) that expresses a message on a matter of pressing public concern. And because the district requires other speech (preferred pronouns) that expresses a competing view, it has discriminated based on its students' viewpoints. Its approach thus raises serious free-speech concerns. On the other hand, the school district rightly responds that it has a duty to protect all students- including transgender and nonbinary students— from bullying and harassment. And this protection, while necessarily restricting speech, does not violate the Free Speech Clause. So which of these competing concerns should prevail in this case? The Supreme Court's cases provide a clear answer. A school district may not restrict personal speech on matters of public concern unless the speech would "materially and substantially disrupt" school activities or infringe the legal "rights of others" in the school community. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969). In this case's current posture, the school district has fallen far short of meeting this demanding standard. It introduced no evidence that the use of biological pronouns would disrupt school functions or qualify as harassment under Ohio law. Our society continues to debate whether biological pronouns are appropriate or offensive just as it continues to debate many other issues surrounding transgender rights. The school district may not skew this debate by forcing one side to change the way it conveys its message or by compelling it to express a different view. We thus reverse and remand Case: 23-3630 Document: 253-2 Filed: 11/06/2025 Page: 4 No. 23-3630 Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Loc. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., et al. Page 4 for the entry of an appropriately tailored preliminary injunction barring the district from punishing students for the commonplace use of biological pronouns. Yet nothing we say here forecloses the district from enforcing its anti-harassment policies against the abuse of transgender students just as it enforces those policies against the abuse of all other students.
November 7, 2025 at 3:46 AM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
maimonidesnutz.bsky.social
Checked Threads randomly the other day and it seems as if they’ve reached the seventh circle of hell in terms of discourse
No Christian have ever killed a Muslim in the name of Jesus
November 6, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Reposted by CyberWillow🏳️‍⚧️
transmetropolitanr.bsky.social
lol
November 6, 2025 at 4:47 AM