I rewatched the entire thing from the start so that I was ready!

The trouble is that Labour have gone back on so much. And they are totally transphobic. This is just another thing to hate them for.

So why be so harsh on people who voted a certain way. Just say “we want to do this but can’t afford right now”. Easy!

You shouldn’t promise what you don’t think you can deliver.

So why did they act against people who voted for removal?

Labour said a lot in opposition and then did a full 180 when they came in to power. Labour were definitely not going to do this until they got frightened by the greens.

You misspelled child.

Its basically catch 22. Fight the hate and be found not affected enough or basically don’t even try and live your life with the shit that is happening because you can’t cope with a court case. I hope that glinners now fucks off back to Arizona and we can block him and forget about him.

I feel this case is like rape cases in so much as misogyny in the courts make many of them fail and there’s a reason why so few actually get court. The courts are biased and its hard for the victims. In this case the child is strong and so was not “distressed enough” according to the judge.

By mass or number?

That’s what door frames are for!