Carly Lane-Perry
banner
carlylane.bsky.social
Carly Lane-Perry
@carlylane.bsky.social
Senior TV editor @ Collider. Romance nerd @ Vulture. TCA member. Author of A REGENCY GUIDE TO MODERN LIFE from DK Books. She/her. Subscribe to my Kissing Books newsletter: https://kissing-books.ghost.io/
Honestly, I wasn't sure I was going to have time to write anything about Heated Rivalry this week, but coffee and spite might very well be the things that fuel me to get it done
December 9, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Reposted by Carly Lane-Perry
the 2026 new horror list is FINALLY LIVE! please share with all your freakiest loved ones: readjumpscares.com/2026-new-hor...
2026’s New Horror Books
All the new horror books coming in 2026, featuring all manner of hauntings, murderers, vampires, monsters, cults, ghosts, and all kinds of nebulous eldritch terrors.
readjumpscares.com
December 5, 2025 at 8:08 PM
My WIP theory is that they saw the story begins with the MCs meeting as teenagers, but didn’t read far enough along to account for the multiple timejumps
December 9, 2025 at 12:44 AM
That’s also very likely, especially if they didn’t read further to see there are time jumps!
December 8, 2025 at 11:06 PM
I don’t even think this is coming from critics who know or have read the books, TBH, but it’s also possible they image-searched the covers on Google and came to a certain conclusion!
December 8, 2025 at 10:52 PM
But mostly every time I see Heated Rivalry described as a YA romance adaptation a part of my soul shrivels up and floats away
December 8, 2025 at 10:42 PM
I feel like a lot of it can be broken out into: readers who are passionately protective of the books, critics who aren’t romance readers engaging without that genre knowledge, folks unknowingly relitigating old discourse about m/m romance, and then the hot take dispensers that the algorithm boosts
December 8, 2025 at 10:39 PM
It’s probably a good thing that most of the discourse about this show has shot past me because even the summarizing takes about it have been infuriating!
December 8, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Truthfully, I have an Idea for a piece about this week’s episode but I have to see if there’s time to write it!
December 8, 2025 at 10:29 PM
I feel like performance effectiveness is probably its own separate discussion — I'm only going off of the more general observations I've read about the show validating a closer watch in the unfortunate era of second-screen viewing, rather than anything focused on acting capabilities.
December 8, 2025 at 8:34 PM
That could be! I haven't read the books myself, so I don't have the original writing to compare it to, but I have read a lot of romance so that may be making it easier to pick up on the no-dialogue moments in which the acting is successfully capturing the introspection
December 8, 2025 at 6:20 PM
This — I think the interiority of romance is something that TV has long struggled with adapting, so when a show gets it right through the writing and the acting, it gets distilled through a certain lens (which is where, I assume, the "microexpressions" shorthand is coming from)
December 8, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Congratulations, you look stunning!
December 7, 2025 at 6:15 PM