Carl
@carlwaring.bsky.social
PC geek and hospital radio presenter/imaging producer. OED: Woke = being aware or well-informed in a cultural sense = me. Also still on the other place with same @
Correct. I don't see a problem with that. You do know what those two words mean, don't you?
November 28, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Correct. I don't see a problem with that. You do know what those two words mean, don't you?
No he probably didn't.
November 27, 2025 at 9:36 AM
No he probably didn't.
And how could it access that data without a login?
November 26, 2025 at 10:46 AM
And how could it access that data without a login?
This is why I'm so glad I have yet to be summoned for Jury Duty. I wouldn't have a clue what I'm doing or who to believe!
November 25, 2025 at 5:18 PM
This is why I'm so glad I have yet to be summoned for Jury Duty. I wouldn't have a clue what I'm doing or who to believe!
I have found AI to be really useful. It has recently helped my find a smartwatch and do a lot of Python coding; which I don't know how to do myself and don't have time to learn. Was it perfect? No. Did it make mistakes I had to correct? Yes. But it was easier and quicker than a search engine.
November 25, 2025 at 1:43 PM
I have found AI to be really useful. It has recently helped my find a smartwatch and do a lot of Python coding; which I don't know how to do myself and don't have time to learn. Was it perfect? No. Did it make mistakes I had to correct? Yes. But it was easier and quicker than a search engine.
Genuine question, then. Which is which? I assume science/medical research is the former, whilst me using Copilot is the latter?
November 23, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Genuine question, then. Which is which? I assume science/medical research is the former, whilst me using Copilot is the latter?
What a completely one-sided (ie biased) article. Here's a counter to it. (Which, of course, fewer people will see.)
chatgpt.com/s/t_692182d8...
chatgpt.com/s/t_692182d8...
November 22, 2025 at 9:33 AM
What a completely one-sided (ie biased) article. Here's a counter to it. (Which, of course, fewer people will see.)
chatgpt.com/s/t_692182d8...
chatgpt.com/s/t_692182d8...
It can be if you're a local business and you hear the same set of songs on repeat all day.
November 21, 2025 at 3:53 PM
It can be if you're a local business and you hear the same set of songs on repeat all day.
Reposted by Carl
Billionaires should not exist.
Trillionaires are de facto criminals
This is earth, finite and impermanent.
We are humans, impermanent and finite.
11 hold more of earths resources than 7 billion people do.
That’s not humanity that’s hoarding.
Trillionaires are de facto criminals
This is earth, finite and impermanent.
We are humans, impermanent and finite.
11 hold more of earths resources than 7 billion people do.
That’s not humanity that’s hoarding.
November 21, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Billionaires should not exist.
Trillionaires are de facto criminals
This is earth, finite and impermanent.
We are humans, impermanent and finite.
11 hold more of earths resources than 7 billion people do.
That’s not humanity that’s hoarding.
Trillionaires are de facto criminals
This is earth, finite and impermanent.
We are humans, impermanent and finite.
11 hold more of earths resources than 7 billion people do.
That’s not humanity that’s hoarding.
Martin Gero, Brad Wright and Joe Mallozzi AND Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich? It *should* be awesome!!
November 19, 2025 at 6:34 PM
Martin Gero, Brad Wright and Joe Mallozzi AND Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich? It *should* be awesome!!
Oh absolutely. As a musician (keyboard/organ) I have the same objections to AI-produced music as you do for art.
And that's even though I understand that music can quantified and is rather mathematical and therefore more easily produced by AI.
And that's even though I understand that music can quantified and is rather mathematical and therefore more easily produced by AI.
November 15, 2025 at 11:50 AM
Oh absolutely. As a musician (keyboard/organ) I have the same objections to AI-produced music as you do for art.
And that's even though I understand that music can quantified and is rather mathematical and therefore more easily produced by AI.
And that's even though I understand that music can quantified and is rather mathematical and therefore more easily produced by AI.
Sorry but that's a ridiculous analogy. Football has rules; art doesn't. Football is objective; Art is subjective. I wouldn't like that picture even if it had been painted by a human. My subjective opinion is that it's awful.
November 15, 2025 at 11:48 AM
Sorry but that's a ridiculous analogy. Football has rules; art doesn't. Football is objective; Art is subjective. I wouldn't like that picture even if it had been painted by a human. My subjective opinion is that it's awful.
I can't really tell it's AI. I'm sure I've seen worse actual "art".
As the saying goes, it's in the eye of the beholder.
But I do agree with your main point that art is a "human" thing and AI shouldn't be being used for it.
As the saying goes, it's in the eye of the beholder.
But I do agree with your main point that art is a "human" thing and AI shouldn't be being used for it.
November 15, 2025 at 10:45 AM
I can't really tell it's AI. I'm sure I've seen worse actual "art".
As the saying goes, it's in the eye of the beholder.
But I do agree with your main point that art is a "human" thing and AI shouldn't be being used for it.
As the saying goes, it's in the eye of the beholder.
But I do agree with your main point that art is a "human" thing and AI shouldn't be being used for it.
The only other thing I have is this info, which collated from everything available online.
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
BBC News political coverage
A conversational AI system that listens, learns, and challenges
chatgpt.com
November 9, 2025 at 7:52 PM
The only other thing I have is this info, which collated from everything available online.
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
chatgpt.com/s/t_68b0cbe6...
Their editorial guidelines are here. I know no more than this.
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
BBC Editorial Policy
www.bbc.co.uk
November 9, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Their editorial guidelines are here. I know no more than this.
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
www.bbc.co.uk/editorialgui...
Sorry for the misunderstanding. If research/a report into something doesn't take *all factors* into account then how the conclusion that research/report draws be accurate? (To clarify I am not questioning the report's validity. I'm sure it's very well-researcehd and accurate for what it is.)
November 9, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Sorry for the misunderstanding. If research/a report into something doesn't take *all factors* into account then how the conclusion that research/report draws be accurate? (To clarify I am not questioning the report's validity. I'm sure it's very well-researcehd and accurate for what it is.)
But without that knowledge, and taking it into account for this sort of report, doesn't that really invalidate the result as being inaccurate due to it not showing the whole picture?
November 9, 2025 at 5:02 PM
But without that knowledge, and taking it into account for this sort of report, doesn't that really invalidate the result as being inaccurate due to it not showing the whole picture?
Absolutely. I seem to remember there's a petition to that effect floating around somewhere.
November 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Absolutely. I seem to remember there's a petition to that effect floating around somewhere.
What they do, someone, somewhere will complain about it. Doesn't mean they shouldn't do it.
November 9, 2025 at 4:55 PM
What they do, someone, somewhere will complain about it. Doesn't mean they shouldn't do it.
See my earlier reply with regards to *perceptions* of (ie not actual) bias.
November 9, 2025 at 4:54 PM
See my earlier reply with regards to *perceptions* of (ie not actual) bias.