Eurgh. Men.

No, it means what it says.

Enjoy your alternative reality.

I'm off to enjoy the weekend with my family.

No thanks. I have better things to do with my time.

If you want you can look at the systematic reviews around gender affirming care and look in any biology book to see the sex binary.

The difference is that the general consensus around the sex binary and gender affirming is "gender critical".

Climate science deniers and Gender Ideologues both use scientific journals to legitimise their work....

I'm not the person who believes in the pseudoscience of sex is a spectrum and gender affirming care.

Activists have access to journals and use them to legitimise their criticisms.

Are you thinking of the Yale Integrity Projects critique? I think this is a good example of this.

Usually they are in the peer review but its locked behind a paywall. So you need someone like Ben to counteract the misinformation of people like Erin Reed.

I thought as much. It doesn't follow your ideology.

Worth a read
benryan.substack.com/p/suicidalit...

Accuracy is important. That is a man.

Only one study has ever directly assessed whether providing cross-sex hormones to youth attending gender clinics was associated with a statistically significant, independent difference in the suicide death rate. It found no such difference.
3/

Nor did it state anything about whether such treatment saves lives.

In fact, I asked the study’s lead author if his paper reached the conclusion that Reed claimed, that it showed that pediatric gender-transition treatment reduced the suicide death rate. He said that it did not.
2/

It’s okay. I know you are trolling.

Bye.

🙄

Great choices

Think you need to put your reading glasses back on.