Poll workers need to be extra vigilant tomorrow. There will be threats and intimidation towards voters. It’s only 1 district, & they should have additional response teams on standby for potential disruption.

More like the other way around.

I’ve been deliberately searching for local artisans for gifts this year. I’ve found hand knitted sweaters, jewelry, stained glass, yard ornaments, pottery, candles, body lotions, baby blankets, and wall art. Some are pricey, but I know who is getting paid.

I’m sure he has a few offshore bank accounts loaded with payments from Moscow.

I'm convinced Stephen Miller is his ghost writer.

Way too many shootings that have no benefit to the shooter, other than being a patzy.
Selective info from official & key sources are now terrified to go on record to reporters or investigators.

All kinds of convenient crises this admin will use to justify more aggressive responses.

More like several different women did.
Individually.
Over decades.

He’s so hyper masculine because he knows he’s an inferior being.
He’s convinced himself that he’s superior to everyone around him, but he knows he’s an abject failure.
He’s terrified of the fact that women are more capable of doing everything better than him.

It’s the fear that someone else is getting something equal to them. They don’t believe everyone is entitled to fair and equitable treatment.

Chuck Todd suddenly learned how to act like a political reporter?

Where did he find his ⚽️ 🏀 🏈 ?

Technology has surpassed the comprehension of many in Congress. Legislation is obsolete by the time it’s passed. They don’t understand that they have to move faster. Committees can’t take 6 months-1 year before drafting bills anymore. Bills need to anticipate tech changes, too.

What I assigned to you was the fact you assumed I was defending him. Because I used the term “social norms”.

Is it different? Perhaps not. I had more to draw info from than your initial comment. And your posts were condescending, as if norms are inherently bad in all cases.

I agreed with you in your original reply. Followed that up with how he adhered to social norms & let (unleashed) the media to do his dirty work. I called it dirty for a reason.
You & others only saw “social norms” & commented on that point.
Then you restated it again.

Good.
She can be referred for Obstruction of Congress.
She has no 5th Amendment rights for something she already was convicted.
Unless, she could incriminate herself for new charges with different victims.
She can’t be tried again for the same crime.

You assumed, rather than ask for clarification.
Not anything I said.
You wanted to attack.

I thought saying he let the media do his dirty work was enough to make that understood.

Obviously not.