I’ve seen a lot festive spread at Denny’s.

Maybe we should rebrand the “Einstein Visa” as the “Epstein Visa”

So, Noem, Hegseth, Patel, Rubio, and Gabbard?

I would never have guessed redacting those non-existent “hoax” files would be so expensive.

Wait. Is he seriously endorsing the Republican Party’s prohibitions on Jewish and Slavic immigration after 1924, and supporting Congress’s embargo on allowing the Jewish passengers on the SS St Louis from entering the US?

The same people who deny vaccines, promote nonsense conspiracy theories while sacrificing their children to MAGA.

The follow on question is that after the Democrats retake Congress and very likely retake the White House in 2028 - what do these universities think will happen? In particular, what do the leadership and boards think will happen TO THEM.

Do you remove your shoes before sitting?

That’s a far better look than his ugly schmatta.

Mamdani is handsome, charming and intelligent. Two things we know about Trump: he’s easily swayed by handsome men and his behavior in person frequently is the opposite of his Internet trolling persona.

Trump is inauthentic while Mandani is. Watch the Islamophobes overflow their Depends over this.

When you assert disproved and second-sourced links, you can’t assemble a coherent timeline that supports your basic hypothesis, insert your personal opinion instead of demonstrated facts - it’s cherry picking. Worse, it’s post hoc ergo propter hoc.

That’s why you need Philosophy 301: basic logic.

That was a 1980s program, a remote viewing project that ran until the early 1990s when it was defunded. Flatly, it was a failure. It had nothing to do enough Scientology.

You need a 300 level philosophy class that covers logical fallacy and reasoning. All of your arguments were cherry picking.

Because Stargate was 1970s, and NOT CIA.

Oh dear. That’s just desperate.

He adapted most of it from Church of
Satan, stripping out the religious parts. That’s Occam’s Razor.

The CIA interest was after Dianetics was published, and not for interest in his techniques but for whether his cult (as the CIA described it) represented a threat to national security.

He’s pretending Article 7 doesn’t exist? Has he already forgotten his 2016 letters to the former Chairman of the JCS about his concern over unlawful orders and that military leadership would not obey.

You’re free to believe what you wish. But, your beliefs don’t align with facts like the CIA investigation of Dianetics and him as a threat.

I didn’t see any references to these programs or persons in the link. Beriya ran spies, not contractors: he was holding hundreds of German scientists as POWs, while inducing the Cambridge 6. When he wanted someone, he used kidnapping or blackmail.