His Dudeness
@atlgreg1.bsky.social
I was, uh, one of the authors of the Port Huron Statement. The original Port Huron Statement. Not the compromised second draft.
Pinned
PUT VANDERBILT IN THE PLAYOFFS, YOU COWARDS!
December 7, 2025 at 5:04 AM
PUT VANDERBILT IN THE PLAYOFFS, YOU COWARDS!
Reposted by His Dudeness
Under Trump, America is committing war crimes. But under Biden, there were irritating student protests at a college I did not attend. I have never felt more politically homeless.
December 7, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Under Trump, America is committing war crimes. But under Biden, there were irritating student protests at a college I did not attend. I have never felt more politically homeless.
Reposted by His Dudeness
Federal agents have repeatedly detained or used force against people who seem to be protesting peacefully, videos show | CNN Politics www.cnn.com/2025/12/06/p...
Federal agents have repeatedly detained or used force against people who seem to be protesting peacefully, videos show | CNN Politics
In several cities, federal agents deployed by the president have detained, chased, shoved, sprayed or shot with projectiles people protesting peacefully.
www.cnn.com
December 7, 2025 at 4:38 AM
Federal agents have repeatedly detained or used force against people who seem to be protesting peacefully, videos show | CNN Politics www.cnn.com/2025/12/06/p...
Because daddy never hugged him
Literally all this dude wants is for people to give him endless stupid awards and tell him how good and brilliant he is, doesn’t matter who, doesn’t matter if the awards are fake. Just gold stuff for the very special boy while he wrecks the world
December 7, 2025 at 4:58 AM
Because daddy never hugged him
Reposted by His Dudeness
A Palantir billionaire just called for public hangings.
“It's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable,” writes Joe Lonsdale.
This is where Silicon Valley authoritarianism is heading:
www.thenerdreich.com/joe-lonsdale...
“It's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable,” writes Joe Lonsdale.
This is where Silicon Valley authoritarianism is heading:
www.thenerdreich.com/joe-lonsdale...
Joe Lonsdale Calls For Public Hangings
Silicon Valley radicalization escalates
www.thenerdreich.com
December 6, 2025 at 9:15 PM
A Palantir billionaire just called for public hangings.
“It's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable,” writes Joe Lonsdale.
This is where Silicon Valley authoritarianism is heading:
www.thenerdreich.com/joe-lonsdale...
“It's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable,” writes Joe Lonsdale.
This is where Silicon Valley authoritarianism is heading:
www.thenerdreich.com/joe-lonsdale...
If Dems take House, they should begin series of SCOTUS ethics investigations surrounding bribery, financial disclosure, past allegations of misconduct, conflicts of interest, failure to recuse, and, last but not least, the shadow docket. Lays groundwork for Court-reform as ‘28 campaign issue.
December 7, 2025 at 4:45 AM
If Dems take House, they should begin series of SCOTUS ethics investigations surrounding bribery, financial disclosure, past allegations of misconduct, conflicts of interest, failure to recuse, and, last but not least, the shadow docket. Lays groundwork for Court-reform as ‘28 campaign issue.
Reposted by His Dudeness
Not a criticism of this (excellent!) thread, or Casten in particular, but I do think Democrats need to start laying out clear, definitive and escalatory steps they plan to take in response if/when SCOTUS goes through with this.
The 14th Amendment says that all people born in America, regardless of race are citizens and have a right to equal protection under the law. For SCOTUS to be remotely confused on that text speaks to their racism, not the Constitution (1/3) www.cnn.com/2025/12/05/p...
Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship | CNN Politics
The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide if President Donald Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship with an executive order is constitutional, offering the justices an opportunity to revisit w...
www.cnn.com
December 7, 2025 at 4:08 AM
Not a criticism of this (excellent!) thread, or Casten in particular, but I do think Democrats need to start laying out clear, definitive and escalatory steps they plan to take in response if/when SCOTUS goes through with this.
Reposted by His Dudeness
There is no sight that more efficiently puts the lie to immigration “court” than the common sight of children “representing themselves.” Children too small to climb into the chair, children in pajamas who don’t know where they are, children not yet old enough to speak.
Three-year-old child forced to serve as her own attorney in Tucson immigration court
More than a dozen undocumented minors were forced to make their case in front of an immigration judge as the Trump administration ramps up removal proceedings.
coppercourier.com
December 6, 2025 at 5:18 PM
There is no sight that more efficiently puts the lie to immigration “court” than the common sight of children “representing themselves.” Children too small to climb into the chair, children in pajamas who don’t know where they are, children not yet old enough to speak.
Imagine being so insecure that you’re driven to this level of hate and stupidity
December 6, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Imagine being so insecure that you’re driven to this level of hate and stupidity
Reposted by His Dudeness
For those interested, here's the presale rates for World Cup tickets to games here in Atlanta as listed today during the domestic purchase window.
November 12, 2025 at 6:49 PM
For those interested, here's the presale rates for World Cup tickets to games here in Atlanta as listed today during the domestic purchase window.
Reposted by His Dudeness
December 5, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Reposted by His Dudeness
"The Donald Trump administration has changed which holidays qualify for free entrance to national parks, removing two holidays celebrating Black people and adding the president’s birthday."
National parks change prioritizes Trump birthday over days honoring Black people
Free entrance days at national parks no longer include MLK Day and Juneteenth.
www.sfgate.com
December 5, 2025 at 4:10 AM
"The Donald Trump administration has changed which holidays qualify for free entrance to national parks, removing two holidays celebrating Black people and adding the president’s birthday."
Reposted by His Dudeness
JUST IN: A 2-1 panel of the D.C. Circuit rules that Trump may remove members of the NLRB or MSPB regardless of laws meant to shield them from removal without cause.
Majority: Rao (Trump), Katsas (Trump)
Dissent: Pan (Biden)
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Majority: Rao (Trump), Katsas (Trump)
Dissent: Pan (Biden)
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
December 5, 2025 at 3:21 PM
JUST IN: A 2-1 panel of the D.C. Circuit rules that Trump may remove members of the NLRB or MSPB regardless of laws meant to shield them from removal without cause.
Majority: Rao (Trump), Katsas (Trump)
Dissent: Pan (Biden)
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Majority: Rao (Trump), Katsas (Trump)
Dissent: Pan (Biden)
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Reposted by His Dudeness
“[T]he Justice Department is determined to try again.”
December 4, 2025 at 11:25 PM
“[T]he Justice Department is determined to try again.”
Reposted by His Dudeness
The Supreme Court just handed Texas Republicans at least 2 more House seats & possibly up to 5 despite the state GOP explicitly justifying their remap based on an unconstitutional use of race in redistricting.
Unsurprising from this court, and it's a bad sign for the upcoming Voting Rights Act case
Unsurprising from this court, and it's a bad sign for the upcoming Voting Rights Act case
BREAKING: Supreme Court sides with Texas Republicans in fight over congressional map. The new gerrymandered map will be used in the 2026 midterms. The vote is 6–3, with the Republican appointees siding with Texas.
December 4, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Reposted by His Dudeness
Also as the dissent points out, just because the impetus for a gerrymander might be partisan doesn't mean you get to do a racial gerrymander!
![In asserting instead that the court’s conclusion was “im-
plausible,” Texas argues that because it was trying to “max-
imize[ ] partisan advantage,” it would have relegated all ra-
cial considerations to the sidelines. Application 11. But
that claim is too simple by half, as this Court has previously
recognized. Because of the “strong correlation[s] between
race and voting behavior,” we have explained, States may
well avail themselves of “race-based districting for ulti-
mately political reasons”—that is, “to advance their parti-
san interests.” Cooper, 581 U. S., at 319, n. 15; see id., at
291, n. 1. So, for example, legislators may “think[ ] that a
proposed district is more ‘sellable’ as a race-based VRA com-
pliance measure than as a political gerrymander and will
accomplish much the same thing.” Id., at 308, n. 7. That is
just what the District Court found that key Texas lawmak-
ers thought in creating and supporting the redistricting
plan. See App. 3, 76; see supra, at 8. The District Court
knew—explained repeatedly—that partisan motives lay be-
neath the new map. See, e.g., App. 2–3, 76–77. But so too
the court found that race was all over it. The lawmakers
created new Republican seats while—indeed, by means of—
converting coalition districts into single-race majority-
minority districts.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2vtbmhmrwzbqcfv4we4uxzzt/bafkreiabu52jsmlbbxiqqhanhhsaqewp4igllmlefchpekcmozqdx3adey@jpeg)
December 4, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Also as the dissent points out, just because the impetus for a gerrymander might be partisan doesn't mean you get to do a racial gerrymander!
Reposted by His Dudeness
"Purcell" is not mentioned, but the majority writes that the court "improperly inserted itself" in an "active" campaign.
The map passed with just weeks to go before the filing deadline!
Basically SCOTUS is saying that means there's no judicial review possible.
The map passed with just weeks to go before the filing deadline!
Basically SCOTUS is saying that means there's no judicial review possible.
December 4, 2025 at 11:12 PM
"Purcell" is not mentioned, but the majority writes that the court "improperly inserted itself" in an "active" campaign.
The map passed with just weeks to go before the filing deadline!
Basically SCOTUS is saying that means there's no judicial review possible.
The map passed with just weeks to go before the filing deadline!
Basically SCOTUS is saying that means there's no judicial review possible.
Reposted by His Dudeness
SCOTUS conservatives just blessed the Texas GOP's gerrymander. It'll be used next year.
They stay the lower-court ruling, written by a Trump-appointed judge, that found the gerrymander to be illegal.
While no clear vote, Alito wrote a concurrence; and only the three liberal justices dissented.
They stay the lower-court ruling, written by a Trump-appointed judge, that found the gerrymander to be illegal.
While no clear vote, Alito wrote a concurrence; and only the three liberal justices dissented.
December 4, 2025 at 11:08 PM
SCOTUS conservatives just blessed the Texas GOP's gerrymander. It'll be used next year.
They stay the lower-court ruling, written by a Trump-appointed judge, that found the gerrymander to be illegal.
While no clear vote, Alito wrote a concurrence; and only the three liberal justices dissented.
They stay the lower-court ruling, written by a Trump-appointed judge, that found the gerrymander to be illegal.
While no clear vote, Alito wrote a concurrence; and only the three liberal justices dissented.
They overruled an opinion written by a Trump appointee. The Court is broken.
Texas clearly did a racial gerrymander, which is illegal.
A district court found that Texas did a racial gerrymander, rejecting the new map because it is illegal.
But the Supreme Court reversed it.
Because? Must assume the gerrymanderers were acting in good faith (despite the evidence otherwise).
A district court found that Texas did a racial gerrymander, rejecting the new map because it is illegal.
But the Supreme Court reversed it.
Because? Must assume the gerrymanderers were acting in good faith (despite the evidence otherwise).
December 4, 2025 at 11:27 PM
They overruled an opinion written by a Trump appointee. The Court is broken.
Reposted by His Dudeness
Are we in a stock market bubble?
There’s a raging debate in markets about the sustainability of today’s high stock valuations, and it starts with this chart👇
Shiller P/E has a strong track record of flagging bubbles, and it's flashing red.
(link below)
There’s a raging debate in markets about the sustainability of today’s high stock valuations, and it starts with this chart👇
Shiller P/E has a strong track record of flagging bubbles, and it's flashing red.
(link below)
December 4, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Are we in a stock market bubble?
There’s a raging debate in markets about the sustainability of today’s high stock valuations, and it starts with this chart👇
Shiller P/E has a strong track record of flagging bubbles, and it's flashing red.
(link below)
There’s a raging debate in markets about the sustainability of today’s high stock valuations, and it starts with this chart👇
Shiller P/E has a strong track record of flagging bubbles, and it's flashing red.
(link below)
Reposted by His Dudeness
They need to release this video to the public
December 4, 2025 at 4:06 PM
They need to release this video to the public
Reposted by His Dudeness
the Comet Ping Pong attack was nine years ago today—weeks after Trump’s 2016 win—and inspired by a conspiracy theory promoted by Jack Posobiec, who was recently invited to the White House, demands antifa be designated a terrorist group, and asked questions as “press” at the Pentagon this week
December 4, 2025 at 1:04 PM
the Comet Ping Pong attack was nine years ago today—weeks after Trump’s 2016 win—and inspired by a conspiracy theory promoted by Jack Posobiec, who was recently invited to the White House, demands antifa be designated a terrorist group, and asked questions as “press” at the Pentagon this week