The danger is that Trump is empowering corporate America in order to capture that power for himself.
The danger is that Trump is empowering corporate America in order to capture that power for himself.
The "why" behind policy matters. The "who," as in "who-is-getting-more-powerful-from-this," matters.
The "why" behind policy matters. The "who," as in "who-is-getting-more-powerful-from-this," matters.
It's telling that corporate America has become so dependent on mergers to succeed, and so fixated on the profits they bring, that they will do *anything,* even bow down to a despot, to get them approved.
It's telling that corporate America has become so dependent on mergers to succeed, and so fixated on the profits they bring, that they will do *anything,* even bow down to a despot, to get them approved.
If you're his friend, you can break all the laws you want — but the minute you step out of line, all your crimes are crimes again.
If everyone is granted an illegal monopoly...well, then anyone can be threatened to have it taken away
If you're his friend, you can break all the laws you want — but the minute you step out of line, all your crimes are crimes again.
If everyone is granted an illegal monopoly...well, then anyone can be threatened to have it taken away
But once they invite him back, rig algorithms right-wards, pay for his ballroom, etc. ... well, free pass.
For as long as they stay aligned, that is.
But once they invite him back, rig algorithms right-wards, pay for his ballroom, etc. ... well, free pass.
For as long as they stay aligned, that is.
Trump is not bringing us back to a world of non-enforcement of the law, however many mergers his admin lets through.
He is creating a world of selective enforcement. The full weight of the law if you're his enemy, and a free pass if you're his friend.
Trump is not bringing us back to a world of non-enforcement of the law, however many mergers his admin lets through.
He is creating a world of selective enforcement. The full weight of the law if you're his enemy, and a free pass if you're his friend.
The government, led by both parties, *chose* to permit unfair mergers and abuses of market power.
Because the goal of neoliberalism is "free" markets, i.e. no gov restriction of corporate actions. Because what is good for corporates trickles down
The government, led by both parties, *chose* to permit unfair mergers and abuses of market power.
Because the goal of neoliberalism is "free" markets, i.e. no gov restriction of corporate actions. Because what is good for corporates trickles down
Because antitrust makes these tactics illegal.
But it's the government's prerogative to decide whether to enforce the law, or not.
Because antitrust makes these tactics illegal.
But it's the government's prerogative to decide whether to enforce the law, or not.
But it is also, more broadly, one of the most powerful economic policies in the government's arsenal. Whether the government goal is to check excess corporate power...or not.
But it is also, more broadly, one of the most powerful economic policies in the government's arsenal. Whether the government goal is to check excess corporate power...or not.
This is authoritarian industrial policy.
This is authoritarian industrial policy.
Reform is still possible: rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...
Reform is still possible: rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...