Andreas Nanz
@andreasnanz.bsky.social
PolComm at TU Munich | formerly University of Vienna
Read-only for raw data is great advice. Also, an intuitive structure for subdirectories is important. But raw data as *.pdf seems a bit... impractical? Are reviewers and (future) readers then supposed to parse your data from a PDF? This sounds a bit error-prone to me (or I don't get it)
March 27, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Read-only for raw data is great advice. Also, an intuitive structure for subdirectories is important. But raw data as *.pdf seems a bit... impractical? Are reviewers and (future) readers then supposed to parse your data from a PDF? This sounds a bit error-prone to me (or I don't get it)
New paper on incidental exposure (IE) w. @rutakaskeleviciute.bsky.social, Stubenvoll, and Matthes in @digitaljournalism.bsky.social📝 We investigated how pol. predispositions (interest and news avoidance) as well as perceptions of content relate to first- and second-level IE. doi.org/10.1080/2167...
March 13, 2025 at 1:50 PM
New paper on incidental exposure (IE) w. @rutakaskeleviciute.bsky.social, Stubenvoll, and Matthes in @digitaljournalism.bsky.social📝 We investigated how pol. predispositions (interest and news avoidance) as well as perceptions of content relate to first- and second-level IE. doi.org/10.1080/2167...
New paper on incidental exposure (IE) in @icsjournal.bsky.social 📝 We investigated how first- (scanning of IE content) and second-level IE (thorough processing) relate to internal pol. efficacy and pol. surveillance knowledge (w. a 3W survey during 2021 GER election 🗳️). doi.org/10.1080/1369...
March 7, 2025 at 12:55 PM
New paper on incidental exposure (IE) in @icsjournal.bsky.social 📝 We investigated how first- (scanning of IE content) and second-level IE (thorough processing) relate to internal pol. efficacy and pol. surveillance knowledge (w. a 3W survey during 2021 GER election 🗳️). doi.org/10.1080/1369...