Try switching from "Ask" mode to "Agent" mode (if it works on Positron)

The end of the treat economy.

Where do you fall on the "ice cream" is good for you spectrum?

3. How much of the prior questions matter if people *feel* better about the types of analyses/advice AI is able to provide? Even if the AI doesn't add a ton of health-improving value, there might be a case for smart, accessible, empathic AI to simply improving the customer experience of healthcare.

Other other questions that remain for health + AI

1. How much genuine insight is there to be gleaned by giving AI access to your blood test history?

2. What value does AI bring to addressing those deeper problems? Can an AI-driven brand motivate you to make meaningful changes to your life?

What's more, the bigger problems healthcare actually needs to solve to add value extend far beyond predicting the future; they are problems of patient compliance, physician communication, empathy, motivation, self-esteem and other human-oriented problems.

I'm not that bullish on companies precisely predicting your future health/diseases with infinite data points about your life. We know many of the most predictive data points already, and they aren't all that precisely predictive of anything.

The open questions for health + AI companies are:

How much data are people willing to share and which comparies are they comfortable sharing it with?

OpenAI? Google? Superpower?

Politics is bigger than one election cycle.

Also a point also made by Jesse Eisenberg in A Real Pain

This is not a game that can be won though. Playing it means losing it.

What evidence is there that added fluoride improves neurologic functioning?

This is kind of a metaphorical version of regularization (could probably made more literal).

We would never say λ=1 is always optimal. There may be contexts where that is good enough, but optimal advice would always be “it depends”.

I view your Q like asking when should λ>1 and when λ<1?

Are you using Cursor or something else?

P.S. It's not a good sign for Google as an organization that this is the query they are *suggesting* to showcase their new search engine. It means the humans involved aren't even aware and/or are not thinking carefully about these tradeoffs.

Where does Google fit into a world with AI search? I don't know!

But there remains a significant amount of iteration/innovation that remains to find an interaction model that strikes the right balance between acqueiescence and pushback.

I hope Google (or someone else) is up to the challenge.