the amount of just utter bullshitting on this topic is quite remarkable. given who is in charge here how can anyone take "bipartisan permitting" talk seriously. www.citizen.org/article/trum...

i'm sure the neutered, generic term "all of the above" phrasing polls great and "subsidies to fossil fuel companies" polls terribly. all about how the question is framed. this was a pretty interesting result from Searchlight.

even when there's no evidence that it resonates with real-world Dem *voters* !

gotcha. don't know the history there!

Why in the world would Dems & the renewables industry play ball with Trump at this point. All of the above is dead. Why pretend it's a thing.

if Big Tech wants to take the risk of boondogles like this, great. But it should not be foisted upon ratepayers.

www.live5news.com/2025/07/10/s...

but not permanently sound given what cheap natgas did to the industry. How nukes will compete with cheap renewables & battery storage is very much not solved!

ah yes, blame enviros for an industry that consistently has no business model

bsky.app/profile/bft....

it’s a winner take all game with far fewer jobs than in the past. so if you climb to the top you feel self important

why bother doing journalism or try to learn a technical topic when you can post on social media

"Don't listen to the pod I'm linking to, which addresses this. Don't examine the details of utility dynamics shaping the grid, the physical characteristics of data centers, or any of the actual on-the-ground questions. Instead, retreat to this tired ideological frame I use for everything."

You’re about to hear many in the commentariat claim a permitting bill, the SPEED Act, will help all energy sources.

The thing folks like Matt Yglesias don’t mention is that SPEED would fail to do anything for renewables without addressing Trump’s bottleneck.

That’s not “sources say” — it is fact.