Aaron Clauset
@aaronclauset.bsky.social
NO KINGS. NO FASCISTS. FUND SCIENCE.
Professor of Computer Science @ BioFrontiers Institute at University of Colorado, Boulder and External Faculty @ Santa Fe Institute
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-8746
Professor of Computer Science @ BioFrontiers Institute at University of Colorado, Boulder and External Faculty @ Santa Fe Institute
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-8746
Ah, darn autocorrect. Tagged the wrong person. Should be @weihuali.bsky.social !
November 6, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Ah, darn autocorrect. Tagged the wrong person. Should be @weihuali.bsky.social !
Yep! The main results are in this paper, from 2022 with @weihsiah.bsky.social and @samzhang.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists - Nature Communications
While inequalities in science are common, most efforts to understand them treat scientists as isolated individuals, ignoring the network effects of collaboration. Here, the authors develop models that...
www.nature.com
November 6, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Yep! The main results are in this paper, from 2022 with @weihsiah.bsky.social and @samzhang.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/s41...
I'm not sure. Advances is unique at AAAS in being academic editors. STM and Sci Immun are professional editors. I know all the journals are fiercely editorially independent of each other, and none of them view each other as "lower". Unfortunately, I don't have data on submissions there
October 27, 2025 at 6:03 PM
I'm not sure. Advances is unique at AAAS in being academic editors. STM and Sci Immun are professional editors. I know all the journals are fiercely editorially independent of each other, and none of them view each other as "lower". Unfortunately, I don't have data on submissions there
People often think many papers rejected by Science end up published at Sci Adv. It’s not the case. Advances is editorially independent (run by academics), extremely picky, and more than 90% of what I handle there are direct submissions. There’s no journal “below” Advances we pass things to (cf. NPG)
October 26, 2025 at 10:36 PM
People often think many papers rejected by Science end up published at Sci Adv. It’s not the case. Advances is editorially independent (run by academics), extremely picky, and more than 90% of what I handle there are direct submissions. There’s no journal “below” Advances we pass things to (cf. NPG)
Have you seen the webweb library? It’s pretty good for a lot of network viz tasks, written in part by @danlarremore.bsky.social : webwebpage.github.io
webweb - webweb
webwebpage.github.io
October 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Have you seen the webweb library? It’s pretty good for a lot of network viz tasks, written in part by @danlarremore.bsky.social : webwebpage.github.io
As a scholar of academic prestige, I highly recommend asking about PhD institution. But, a fun question would be to ask: Which institution has been the most important to you in your life (or career)? (I've never asked that one before)
October 6, 2025 at 8:55 PM
As a scholar of academic prestige, I highly recommend asking about PhD institution. But, a fun question would be to ask: Which institution has been the most important to you in your life (or career)? (I've never asked that one before)